Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru/Article improvement drive

Peru Project‑class

This page is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. WikiProject Peru To-do: edit history watch purge Assess and prioritise articles (log) Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate Create: Expand: new articles; top importance articles FAC / FLC: Peru national football team GAN: Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes Translate: National University of San Marcos Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive Wikify: articles needing attention

Great! hope we start well this ACID --Andersmusician VOTE 00:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now that we have this, I wonder why could Wikipedia:WikiProject_Peru/Peer_review be useful for, any ideas? --Andersmusician VOTE 02:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not every member of the wikiproject may want to participate in the AID, some may want to start or improve an article of they own. Then, they can nominate it to the Wikiproject review page for advice on how to further improve their creations. --Victor12 02:11, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

seems fine to me thanks--Andersmusician VOTE 15:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as Lima will certainly be our next improvement drive, I think we should agree on some guidelines for editing, just for coordination. A good place to start could be Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Guideline, which is a proposal for a standarized city articles layout. It seems pretty good and we can always change whatever we don't like. We also need to agree on a standarized format for citations. Some options include using citation templates or the "short inline citation + bibliography section" system used in the Peru article. What do you think? --Victor12 10:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think it's time to officialy mark Lima as our current collaboration. But who will take the lead?. AgainErick 18:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you are saying it, we haven't specified a closing date for nominations, this is the place and time. --Andersmusician VOTE 03:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we had July 5 for Lima. Since collabs are expected to run for three months, the next one would be October 5. --Victor12 03:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't wait till we pick a new article on October 5, 2007!! --71.178.56.122 (talk) 06:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's gonna be great! --71.178.74.236 (talk) 05:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I still need a little time to consider my vote. --2601:140:C002:E8B0:7990:2D71:B252:DA13 (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page still says we're on for the October 5, 2007 pick, and I'm really looking forward to it! --2601:140:C001:5220:38E8:C4BB:C32F:5283 (talk) 03:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]