Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Moldova

WikiProject Moldova

(Rated NA-class)

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles NA This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WikiProject Moldova

General information (edit · changes)

• Main Project Page • Talk page • Project category
• Members
• Moldova Portal (talk)
• Outline of Moldova
• Announcements
  • New articles
  • Attention needed
  • Article requests
  • Articles up for deletion

Workgroups

• Geography (talk)
  • Chișinău (talk)
• History and Politics (talk)
• Society (talk)
• People (talk)
• Assessment (talk)
• Peer reviews (talk)

Tools

• Bibliography
• Conventions
• Translation guide

Things you can do (edit)

Here are some tasks you can do:

• Requests: edit

  • Photo requests

  • Map requests

  • Article requests: Geography • History and Politics • Society • People

  New Requests

  Please add new requests to the bottom, thank you!
• Expand: assess the quality of 236 unassessed articles.
• Update: {{Moldova topics}}
• Portal maintenance: Update Did you know.

Bine aţi venit! (Welcome) WikiProject Moldova. This page is a the discussion board for all topics related to the Republic of Moldova, and a place for editors interested in Moldova-related articles to gather, socialise and debate. Please post any inquiries under the appropriate heading. Please, archive this page from time to time.

Greetings,

Hi, I am User:Bookku, my expectations to get expanded Black sea related articles failed miserably. I am expecting and requesting at least some help in expanding the article Draft:List of erstwhile slave trading townships with regions surrounding Black sea. In next steps I wish to have a proper map showing erstwhile slave trading townships across black sea.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 10:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi everyone, I've noticed that the Russian Wikipedia has a lot more info on this guy than the English one. I speak Russian, I'd like to translate some of it and don't know if anyone else would like to help? Fourdots2 (talk) 21:55, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There is an RFC at Talk:Moldova#RFC: Should Moldovan be removed as a language in Moldova that may be of interest to those here. Posted here per guidance at Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Publicizing an RfC.  // Timothy :: talk  15:33, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Buidhe has nominated Regulamentul Organic for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]