Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan/Archive/August 2018

Talk & archives for WP Japan
Project talk 2006 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2007 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2008 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2014 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2016 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2020 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2021 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2022 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2023 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Task force talk/archives ↔ Baseball (1) Bibliography (1) ↔ Cinema (1) ↔ CJKV (1) ↔ Districts and municipalities (1) Gaijin tarento (1) ↔ Military history (1, 2, 3) Music (1) Mythology (1, 2, 3, 4) Owarai (1) Politics (1) Prefectures (1) Royalty & nobility (1) Science & technology (1) Shinto (1) ↔ Tokyo (1) ↔ Transwiki ↔ = joint task force
Old notice board All of 2004 Jan–Mar 2005 Apr–Jun 2005 Jul–Oct 2005 Nov–Dec 2005 Jan–Feb 2006 Feb–May 2006 Jun–Dec 2006 Jan–Jun 2007 Jun 2007 – Sep 2008
Related talk/archives Anime and manga (index) Hello! Project (1) Pokémon (index, PAC (1, 2), PAC 2) Sumo (1, 2, 3) Square Enix (index) Tokusatsu (index) Trains (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
Search the archives:
V·T·E

I started an article on Ueno Michiko, a member of the House of Councillors (Japan), because I saw that another editor had started a draft that appeared to be a copyvio of her page at the House of Councillors website. It's just a stub, although the infobox makes the article look long. The corresponding Japanese Wikipedia article is jp:上野通子. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've noted a couple of issues at Template talk:Monarchs of Japan § Discrepancies. Would someone involved in maintaining Japan history templates have a look? Thanks! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 02:08, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented on the talk page. Alex Shih (talk) 22:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think this warrants a rewrite. Anyone up to it? Ominae (talk) 11:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not really interested in the subject, but feel free to ping me if you need some help translating/writing from source materials together. Alex Shih (talk) 22:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Np. I'll have to see if anyone can help with revising the TMPD article. It doesn't look good. Ominae (talk) 02:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I came across an edit at Akira Watanabe (shogi) where “mangaka” was changed to manga artist by TheFarix per MOS:FOREIGN. While I can understand the why changes like this are sometimes made, it seems a bit strange in this case because the stand-alone article is titled “Mangaka”, whereas “manga artist” is a redirect. Assuming the article’s title wasn’t the result of some random move and “Mangaka” is the WP:COMMONNAME, it seems unnecessary to change any use of the word within articles to something else. On the other hand, if this type of cleanup is necessary, then it might be a good idea to discuss whether the name of the article should be changed. Interested in what others might think. — Marchjuly (talk) 21:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree that the current article title implies that links to "mangaka" are all right, and that a move discussion would make clear which to use. Dekimasuよ! 23:33, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to have been a RM back in 2012 which ended in a new consensus, but not sure if there's been a subsequent discussion since then. Someone also attempted to clarify this in Talk:Mangaka#Article title and word usage in other articles back in 2013, but it was basically just a one person discussion. I'm not a big reader of manga, but maybe these days the word "mangaka" is used enough to be considered OK to be used in articles. It might not be a common as "manga" or "anime" per se, but it's use might be wide-spread enough for a link to redirect page to be unnecessary. FWIW, the Oxford online dictionary does have an entry for the word. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about the subject, but an IP has recently added Category:Fukui-Matsudaira clan, Category:Moriyama-Matsudaira clan or Category:Echizen-Matsudaira clan to a bunch of articles. Mindful of WP:OVERCATEGORISATION, we don't normally have categories for subjects not notable enough to have their own article, but there is a bit of flex. Also per WP:REDNOT we don't have links to red-linked categories, either the categories should be created or the links removed. Would someone who does know the area take a look and decide whether these categories are sensible ones, or not, or eg these articles should be reassigned to Category:Matsudaira clan, which does have a matching article? TIA Le Deluge (talk) 18:44, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. There's two more at Category:Matsue-Matsudaira clan and Category:Okudaira-Matsudaira clan. Le Deluge (talk) 10:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Could someone with some familiarity with Japanese take a look at this draft? Several of the references focus on the subject's relatives and don't mention the subject, and a couple of the references look self-published. That said, the topic might still meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF, but I'm having trouble finding sources, and Google Translate is strugling with Japanese. The creating user is new, so I moved the article back to draft space so it didn't get a bunch of deletion tags slapped on it before they had a chance to clean it up. Any help would be much appreciated. Cheers! Ajpolino (talk) 22:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]