Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Neelix/Workshop

This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched To request an amendment or clarification of an Arbitration decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment. To report a violation of an Arbitration decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To request the assistance of an arbitration clerk, see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks.

Wikipedia Arbitration
About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)
Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

(I am not Neelix. I do not know Neelix. I have no connections at all to Neelix.)

Neelix has spawned a very large, vitriolic thread at ANI, which resulted in the Arbcom case. But there are several other smaller threads. Arbcom should look at that behaviour, and (if they agree) express their disapppointmnet.

EG:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Blocks_related_to_Neelix

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Neelix_resigned

(I have no idea how to post diffs. I have no idea how long the above links will work before they go to archive. I have no idea if this is something that Arbcom can look at, or will look at if they can. But the behaviour at ANI has been disgraceful.) --82.132.223.135 (talk) 22:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]