Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 October 22

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Go North East 1, 1A & 1B (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; no obvious parent article. Mackensen (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WorksInCentury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is basically constructed similar to Cat cen nav, which was TFDd and deleted recently. Like that template, this template is the apparent result of some cargo-cult template creation that basically is unnecessary at this time given that a) about only a dozen pages uses this template and b) traversing these categories is sufficiently trivial that this template simply isn't necessary. Izno (talk) 21:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:BooksInCentury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is basically constructed similar to Cat cen nav, which was TFDd and deleted recently. Like that template, this template is the apparent result of some cargo-cult template creation that basically is unnecessary at this time given that a) about only a dozen pages uses this template and b) traversing these categories is sufficiently trivial that this template simply isn't necessary. Izno (talk) 21:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ArchitectureInCentury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is basically constructed similar to Cat cen nav, which was TFDd and deleted recently. Like that template, this template is the apparent result of some cargo-cult template creation that basically is unnecessary at this time given that a) about only a dozen pages uses this template and b) traversing these categories is sufficiently trivial that this template simply isn't necessary. Izno (talk) 21:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:GaelicGamesInCentury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is basically constructed similar to Cat cen nav, which was TFDd and deleted recently. Like that template, this template is the apparent result of some cargo-cult template creation that basically is unnecessary at this time given that a) about only a dozen pages uses this template and b) traversing these categories is sufficiently trivial that this template simply isn't necessary. Izno (talk) 21:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:ShortStoriesInCentury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is basically constructed similar to Cat cen nav, which was TFDd and deleted recently. Like that template, this template is the apparent result of some cargo-cult template creation that basically is unnecessary at this time given that a) about only a dozen pages uses this template and b) traversing these categories is sufficiently trivial that this template simply isn't necessary. Izno (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:OperasInCentury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is basically constructed similar to Cat cen nav, which was TFDd and deleted recently. Like that template, this template is the apparent result of some cargo-cult template creation that basically is unnecessary at this time given that a) about only a dozen pages uses this template and b) traversing these categories is sufficiently trivial that this template simply isn't necessary. Izno (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NovelsInCentury (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is basically constructed similar to Cat cen nav, which was TFDd and deleted recently. Like that template, this template is the apparent result of some cargo-cult template creation that basically is unnecessary at this time given that a) about only a dozen pages uses this template and b) traversing these categories is sufficiently trivial that this template simply isn't necessary. Izno (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Water polo at the World Aquatics Championships team rosters (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An unused fork of Template:Water polo at the World Aquatics Championships which already links the same squad articles for both the men and women teams. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:WNBA current roster footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unused template. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:UNTV Cup roster footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Staten Island Yankees roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused but no longer needed as the team folded in 2020. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Salem-Keizer Volcanoes roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SK Wyverns roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. Sawol (talk) 07:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SHL rosters by team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and not necessary as it just links to the team's rosters. A navbox like this isn't needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NBA all-time roster start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unused template. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NBL Philippines roster footer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. ✗plicit 11:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Puerto Rico 1988 Olympics roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Puerto Rico 1992 Olympics roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both unused but too many red links that don't aid in navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:FC Cincinnati current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:FC Cincinnati (USL) final roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both are unused and should be substituted on the team's article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both not needed. GiantSnowman 11:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Deleting this is unnecessary considering it is still being used on FC Cincinnati's 2018 Season Page OSUBuckeyeFanOSUBuckeyeFan 13:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Leones del Caracas roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Coventry Blaze roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Changwon LG Sakers current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Belgium men's team roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Cape Breton Highlanders current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and outdated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:49, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bacolod Master Sardines roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and the mainspace for the team no longer exists. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these templates. ✗plicit 11:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bærum Basket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Baerum Basket current roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The first template has only one link which is to the team and is only used on there. Everything else is red. The roster template is unused and like the first, one article link with the rest is red. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 11:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Basketball Academie Limburg coaches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and only one link. Not enough here. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Reliable medical sources please. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Reliable medical sources please old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Reliable medical sources please (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Reliable medical sources please old with Template:Reliable medical sources please.
According to the documentation, the first of these templates has an image showing how to create citations; but this was removed. Suggest either reintroducing the image or merging the templates, as they are now nearly identical. ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge Both are pretty much the same. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 October 30. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Barbadian_presidential_elections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Barbadian_elections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).