Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 17

< November 16 November 18 >

November 17

Template:Infobox cat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Hut 8.5 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Infobox cat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Completely useless, possibly qualifies for G2 but erring on the side of caution here. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Localities in Oxelösund Municipality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Localities in Oxelösund Municipality (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 1 link, superfluous: both the municipality and town refer to each other already. P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:06, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Radiolist templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Radiolist AM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
  • Template:Radiolist FM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Both unused, displays only error message, seems not very useful --TheImaCow (talk) 17:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I have TFD-tagged the templates and notified their author. Remagoxer (talk) 17:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rakke Parish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Rakke Parish (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, all links are included in Template:Väike-Maarja Parish --TheImaCow (talk) 17:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Railway stations in Vantaa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Railway stations in Vantaa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox, links are included in Template:Railway stations in Uusimaa --TheImaCow (talk) 17:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rajas of Kamsaar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Rajas of Kamsaar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, none of the 4 "Rajas" have an article, creator is blocked --TheImaCow (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:G.CMay Animation & Film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:G.CMay Animation & Film (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with just one linked article, the rest is mentioned media. No potential to be expanded. LoЯd ۞pεth 16:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 19:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yoruba Traditional Chiefs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted (log) under criterion G7 by Maile66. (non-admin closure) Tol (talk | contribs) @ 23:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Yoruba Traditional Chiefs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, recently blanked by primary author. I don't foresee it being used, and even if it was, it should probably just be a table in the article. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:47, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EDA structure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:EDA structure (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is unused, and was blank without anybody noticing for a month. I don't think it's going to be used, either. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox UK place/trap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Infobox UK place/trap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used in Template:Infobox UK place but should be converted into a standard tracking category inside that infobox. Gonnym (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Author Delete or convert. It served its purpose at that time. Twiceuponatime (talk) 10:22, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GOCE pending

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:GOCE pending (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The category in the /doc Category:Articles with copyedit pending does not exist, nor does the actual category used in the code Category:All articles with copyedit pending. Either this template and process aren't used, or the category should be created. Gonnym (talk) 12:23, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I've been a GOCE coordinator for seven years, and I've never seen this template used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This template seems to be used when a copyedit has started, but the article has been nominated for deletion. Currently in cases like these we note the status of requests over at WP:GOCER, so this template appears to be moot even if either category were created. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or mark historical; redundant an kinda-pointless template per Tenryuu – c/e requests for such articles are usually discussed at REQ Talk and sometimes the requester's talk page. I've never placed this on an article talk either. Baffle☿gab 01:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this well-intentioned but unused template, created by an editor who hasn't been around for a couple of years. Miniapolis 02:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Before my time, but I found this GOCE discussion where it seemed to have traction to be created, back in 2014. – Reidgreg (talk) 03:43, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gaeilge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Gaeilge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Since the category Category:All articles awaiting Irish translations has been deleted over two years ago and yet this template still has the category in the code, it would seem this template (and process) isn't used at all. If it is used, then the category should probably be recreated. Gonnym (talk) 12:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Crunchbase company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Crunchbase company (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
  • Template:Crunchbase person (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

These templates warp {{Crunchbase}} but other than used in one /sandbox (each) they aren't used at all. {{Crunchbase}} itself is used on only 3 articles, so it is safe to say that there is no need for three templates here. Gonnym (talk) 11:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal/old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Portal/old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used and needs to be removed. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal G6 example

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Portal G6 example (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't think it's necessary. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal peer review requests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Portal peer review requests (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ports/old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Ports/old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused templates are never used. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The nomination statement is a meaningless tautology, but regardless, the template is unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portalpeerreview

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:31, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Portalpeerreview (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The category has not been created yet, so this template will never be included. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment – Template was used for the superseded portal peer review process. Category is empty when no reviews are in progress, and was deleted per C1. Certes (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No reason to keep this around when the underlying process is defunct. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multiple issues/doc/old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after history merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:24, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Multiple issues/doc/old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template documents that are no longer in use and should be deleted. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:36, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Year in various calendars/old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Year in various calendars/old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Templates that are no longer used. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:33, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bone and cartilage navs/old

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:30, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Template:Bone and cartilage navs/old (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It's not necessary. Did Q28 make a mess today? 00:28, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unused. The old version can still be found in the page history of Template:Bone and cartilage navs if needed. (Although this is another nomination that completely fails to present any argument for deletion) * Pppery * it has begun... 05:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete. -DePiep (talk) 06:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What is nom saying? -DePiep (talk) 06:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_November_17&oldid=1057013151"