Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 30

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Dhanaulti District (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is not used and has no likelihood of being used. Certes (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Isn't there a speedy delete for stuff like this. Nigej (talk) 13:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  I thought so, and there ought to be, but it doesn't seem to fall within any CSD. Please feel free to find one! Certes (talk) 15:09, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:07, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Delfont Mackintosh (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template completely duplicates Template:Theatres in London, as per WP:DEL-REASON #10. All nine article links in this template are listed in one row of the Theatres in London template. Epicgenius (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Having both in articles like Gielgud Theatre doesn't help navigation, it's is just confusing for our readers. One or the other, and Theatres in London seems preferable. Nigej (talk) 13:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Quran-audio (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template where it displays a link to Quran audio but it also states it's for the infobox, Template:Infobox surah, but there is no audio file as part of the template. Surah Infobox provides English translation of Quran chapters but no audio format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment is this supposed to be an external link template? Per the documentation, it seems to suggest it should link to freequranmp3.com/ghamdi/###.mp3 -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Actually, the |audio= parameter in {{Infobox surah}} provides an option to add audio, by way of linking to an uploaded file. Regarding {{Quran-audio}}: while freequranmp3.com implies to have no copyright ("© Nobody"), I highly doubt that all reciters listed on https://freequranmp3.com/ have given their permission for such copyright-free publication and that the website is violating their copyright. I'd thus vouch for delete per WP:ELNEVER#1. --HyperGaruda (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 6. Izno (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:IstZahl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AirTrain color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused rail template. FYI Gonnym. BLAIXX 16:30, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 16:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no longer used. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 11:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Translation/Preload (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As it is, the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 11:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used as a preload template on about 60 pages. They are marked as historical so no objection to deletion but they should have the template removed from the forms if it is deleted. User:GKFX^talk 23:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Was only nominated for deletion because of a misunderstanding of its purpose. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:19, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. Nigej (talk) 15:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, with comment Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_5#Template:Talkback/preload was deleted, even though User:AnomieBOT uses it as a preload in it's source code (User:AnomieBOT/source/d/Talk.pm). – radar³³ 19:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Transportation geography graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Transportation geography graphical timeline is never going to be linear especially with different modes and events overlap. Darrelljon (talk) 11:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Only used in Transport geography. Content seems unsuitable for that article anyway, since it primarily relates to technology. Template is also a mess, with much overlapping content. Maybe that aspect could be improved but not worth the effort IMO. Nigej (talk) 11:35, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 1 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 2 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 3 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 4 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 5 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 6 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 7 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 8 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Compatibility Table for HAZMAT Class 9 Materials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above templates are tables that are each used in one article. As this is regular article content, it should be subst into their articles and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 10:20, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Subst/delete per nom. Single use article content. Nigej (talk) 10:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Subst/delete Having created one of the templates under consideration, I can't foresee a use for the tables across multiple articles. This seems pretty logical.--The Navigators (talk) 22:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree with proposal since the author, The Navigators, supports, and merging will likely simplify. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:41, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Party shading/Latvian Way (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/New Era Party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/People's Party (Latvia) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Latvia political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 10:08, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 04:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Party shading/INC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Indian National Congress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Indian National Congress (Indira) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Indian National Congress (R) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Janata Party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Janata Party (Secular) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/JP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Indian political party shading (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused India political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 10:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 04:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Greek Party shading key (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used only in one talk page. Should be subst there and deleted. --Gonnym (talk) 10:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 04:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Party shading/English Party (Greece) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/French Party (Greece) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Liberal Party (Greece) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Nationalist Party (Greece) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/New Party (Greece) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/People's Party (Greece) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Russian Party (Greece) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Greece political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 04:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:17, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Party shading/Colombian conservatives (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Colombian green (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Party shading/Colombian liberal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Colombia political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 04:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Luigi topicon (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation. This template was created by an editor who ended up causing a ton of trouble (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CentralTime301/Archive and their user talk page history) and is now blocked for sockpuppetry that began around the time of this template's creation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused. and pointless too. Nigej (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFX^talk 14:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:DYK user expanded topicon large (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links, no categories. Redundant to {{DYK user topicon}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 04:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Youth Lightning World Championship medallists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used in one article. Article content that should be substed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Subst/delete to List of World Championships medalists in sailing (centreboard classes). This is article content. Nigej (talk) 07:45, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 10:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:26, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Masters Lightning World Championship medallists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Lightning World Championship medallists (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. There is only one incoming link from non-talk space, a cross-namespace link from this article. This is article content in template space. It could be moved to an article, but there is not currently an appropriate article for it. The closest articles are probably World championships in sailing and List of World Championships medalists in sailing (centreboard classes). – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Subst/delete to List of World Championships medalists in sailing (centreboard classes). This is article content. Nigej (talk) 07:50, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the content was and should be on the page Lightning (dinghy) which is the equipment these titles are specifically related to. By having them on the equipment page those specifically interested in that "class" maintain the content. Unfortunately another user had the same content repeated on List of World Championships medalists in sailing (centreboard classes) and there was from memory also a specific page for the World Championships which you will find for a number of classes. For this reason rather than reaching a consensus this data ended up going down the template route. I personally do not understand List of World Championships medalists in sailing these pages are for to long and incomplete and were not maintained. In regards to the templates I have started improving the referencing of these and as I did a lot of the original research and then helped with the later templates. What I never understand about these discussion is why certain one get picked out of literally a hundred simpler templates see Category:Sailing_world_championship_templates Yachty4000 (talk) 16:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or userfy to Yachty4000's sandbox if they want it. I couldn't find an article for the competition, so I'd oppose having two tables for their winners. I'd also oppose adding it to Lightning (dinghy) as that article is about the boat. Gonnym (talk) 10:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 04:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Map of Bushehr Province (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. There are better maps in use at Bushehr Province. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Better maps available. Nigej (talk) 08:11, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:HazmatClass (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is no longer in use. oh! Q28 (talk) 02:16, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems to be part of an unused system, including {{Hazmat}} and {{Hazmat hazmaticon}} which can be deleted too. Perhaps the {{HAZMAT Cat 1}}, etc. do the job instead. Nigej (talk) 08:30, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The Hazmat family of templates seems to have been made unused with the removal of the |EU_class= from {{Chembox}}. Gonnym (talk) 10:17, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Speedway race format - t5 r5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It's not going to be used, okay? Q28 (talk) 02:14, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused for 13 years. Nigej (talk) 08:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Speedway race format - t4 r4+1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Awesome, the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 02:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused for 13 years. Nigej (talk) 08:13, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 January 6. Izno (talk) 02:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Missing_articles_in_category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Now the template is no longer in use. Q28 (talk) 02:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete letters should be typed directly rather than using templates, as discussed at TfD / December 23 # Beta letter. User:GKFX^talk 14:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CanLeg1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Oh, the template is no longer used, thank you. Q28 (talk) 02:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unused. Presumably relates to Canadian Legislature. Nigej (talk) 08:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Colort/end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is no longer in use, because it has been substed. Q28 (talk) 02:07, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment why was it substituted? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment the tables should end using {{end table}} instead of needing this subtemplate -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 05:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't think this was subst at all, but rather just never used. It's not categorized, it has no documentation and it has no incoming links from the parent template. It also isn't part of a grouping of "begin and end" templates. In this case there is not even a need for a redirect. Gonnym (talk) 10:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:64TeamAnd32TeamX2RoundBracket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

But the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• DeIete as unused. I recently changed a number of articles to use alternatives. Nigej (talk) 07:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unused. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:64TeamAnd32TeamBracket-NoSeeds-Byes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

A single template is not used. Q28 (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• DeIete as unused. I recently changed a number of articles to use alternatives. Nigej (talk) 07:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unused. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:32Team-2Round-NoSeeds-Byes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We understand that the template is not used. Q28 (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• DeIete as unused. I recently changed a number of articles to use alternatives. Nigej (talk) 07:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unused. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).