Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 April 24

< April 23 April 25 >

April 24

Template:Tpcleanup underway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:15, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tpcleanup underway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template from a defunct wikiproject (Wikipedia:WikiProject Talk pages). I can't imagine a circumstance in which it would be appropriate to put this on a talk page. DexDor (talk) 21:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Hard to gauge if this is "unused" as by it's nature this is only a temporary notice. Obviously it's meant to go on talk pages that are "currently undergoing cleanup", but besides advertising the WikiProject it appears to be redundant to {{in use}}. PC78 (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox CFL team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 May 9. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Oakland, New Jersey Schools

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Participants are in favour of keeping the navbox now that it's been repurposed. (nac) Alakzi (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oakland, New Jersey Schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded template for such a small amount of schools, that are even actual articles. No other municipalities include their own template for schools, just counties. Tinton5 (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Templates like this should be used for navigation. The articles for this one, for the most part, haven't been created, and probably shouldn't be created (a redirect to the school district page should be enough). Karanacs (talk) 17:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: The elementary school names were intentionally not linked. However this template does not only have those elementary schools. It also links to the senior high school and the Japanese school, which do have articles, and it has a redlink to Barnstable Academy. If need be I can expand this template to all aspects of the city of Oakland so other things are linked. WhisperToMe (talk) 11:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Still, this template is not needed. That's what we have a category for. Now if there were over a dozen schools with links, then maybe, just maybe I would think differently. Tinton5 (talk) 19:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, the category: Category:Schools in Oakland, New Jersey doesn't seem necessary, either. Category:Schools in Bergen County, New Jersey should suffice. But that's another topic. Tinton5 (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep by broadening template: I found that there are some National Register of Historic Places properties in Oakland. So I am adding them to the template as a way to "list all notable places" in the city. I moved the template to: Template:Oakland, New Jersey WhisperToMe (talk) 13:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep They're not too common in smaller municipalities across the nation or New Jersey, but a template like this does serve as an aid to navigation. With the renaming and repurposing from schools to articles related to Oakland, I think that this is an appropriate addition to these articles per WP:CLN. I would remove any non-existent articles from the template and I would oppose the inclusion of people in the template, as has been done elsewhere. Alansohn (talk) 16:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change vote to keep I would like to withdraw this nomination, due to the current state of the template, as it has been improved greatly. Tinton5 (talk) 19:40, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Lacrosse team infoboxes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox NLL team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox MLL team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox PLL team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox NLL defunct team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox NLL team, Template:Infobox PLL team and Template:Infobox NLL defunct team with Template:Infobox MLL team.
League forks with an extremely high degree of overlap; we can accommodate all of them in a single {{Infobox professional lacrosse team}}. Alakzi (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge as proposed. Do we need the word "professional" in the new name? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are significant departures between the leagues' fields, like Steinfeld Cup vs Champion's Cup, and Home Stadium vs Home Arena. Powers T 15:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox NWSL College Draft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox NWSL College Draft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox MLS SuperDraft (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Infobox NWSL College Draft with Template:Infobox MLS SuperDraft.
Gender fork of {{Infobox MLS SuperDraft}}; we can accommodate both leagues in a single infobox. Alakzi (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:39, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question @Alakzi: - can you provide more details on how this would be merged and appear? Hmlarson (talk) 02:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • merge as suggested (comment added after discussion was closed per request). Frietjes (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TemplatePromoter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TemplatePromoter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that doesn't appear to be useful. Template creator advertised it (e.g. here), but it hasn't caught on. DexDor (talk) 05:53, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

this is agradman, the template's creator, not logged in. Just here to say that I no longer edit Wikipedia and I can't even remember what this template was for. I have no objection to deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.242.26.186 (talk) 05:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MUBI film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:12, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MUBI film (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Advertising spam adding links to a film forum. See [1] and [2] as examples. Betty Logan (talk) 03:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Not a useful link, fails WP:EL. PC78 (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Frietjes (talk) 14:41, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (Disclosure: I created the template.) MUBI is a well known and highly respected film database, and I am currently in the process of adding links to ~1000 of MUBI's highest rated films. Hueymc (talk) 03:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete A WP:SPAM sales link that clearly fails WP:ELNO. MarnetteD|Talk 03:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. We already have enough templates for film databases (IMDb, AFI, Allmovie, etc). I don't think we need yet another. The spammy nature of this one makes it especially dubious. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_24&oldid=662042840"