Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Escoperloit/Archive


Escoperloit

Escoperloit (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

02 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Vekjat (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Editor making same additions as previous socks. Can we have a check for any sleepers? Cordless Larry (talk) 08:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Given [1] and [2] this is a duck and can be blocked on that basis, but  Clerk endorsed for sleepers since we haven't had a check in over a month. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 09:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • They're using a different range from the last few socks I checked, but the ISP, geolocation and user agent are identical - combined with the editing, I'm tagging as confirmed. Will request lock, closing. Girth Summit (blether) 11:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict)  In progress - There is definitely more here, up to 18 potential socks, but I will need to look more in depth into them. I won't object to a second CU looking at this and then i'll wrap back to it to confirm. @Girth Summit: as I edit conflicted you. -- Amanda (she/her) 11:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks - I'll take another look once you've finished your check so see what I missed. Girth Summit (blether) 12:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Girth Summit: per below. -- Amanda (she/her) 17:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed:
 Possible to the above and to each other:
These confirmed accounts have the same technical data on a large range as the archive. Behavioral analysis should be looked into to see if the two groups are a match. -- Amanda (she/her) 17:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm going to add Bandarc to the list above. There's not a huge amount to go on in terms of behavioural analysis - each account seems to have been created, used for a few edits, then thrown away. That in itself is something of a pattern though, and coupled with the CU similarities and the similar editing interests, I'm going to block all as suspected. Dukanmars hasn't edited, but looks a lot like a sleeper, and am including in the blocks. Girth Summit (blether) 23:37, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17 February 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Brisbanesr (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New editor restoring the same material as previous socks. Requesting check for sleepers. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Cordless Larry (talk) 17:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  In progress - Girth Summit (blether) 11:07, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Brisbanesr geolocates to the same place, but is on a different range. Given the edits, I'm going to block as suspected.
  • When I checked some of the old accounts, I found the following which I'm prepared to say are  Confirmed
  • I'm going to leave this open - I need to run now, last time a deeper dive uncovered a lot of socks. Blocking these ones. Girth Summit (blether) 11:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, I'm not seeing any more on that range, closing. Girth Summit (blether) 11:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21 March 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Zangled (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)
  • Danfra20 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

All created within minutes of each other, all of them editing at Sanandaj. A checkuser may reveal other possible dormant socks. DoebLoggs (talk) 13:40, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

31 July 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Sjavdt (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Sajid75r (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Danestrm (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Timberg91 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Amad89 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

New accounts making same edits as previous socks. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:15, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • These five are all internally  Confirmed to each other. Archive is, unfortunately, stale, but I'm willing to call the whole lot proven. Courcelles (talk) 01:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Blocked and tagged Courcelles (talk) 01:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21 February 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Puriahs1 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Khatamimp (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Jilazana20 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Farah89n (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Same idiosyncratic wording here and here. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding older account Khatamimp for completeness. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Adding Jilazana20 per this. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also adding Farah89n per this. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Puriahs1 and Jilazana20 are  Confirmed to each other; all other accounts are  Stale, but the data aligns with historical information.  Blocked and tagged; no action needed against the stale accounts (please feel free to re-report if they return to activity). Closing. Mz7 (talk) 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

28 February 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

  • Stestb (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

WP:DUCK (see this). Could we have a check for sleepers? Cordless Larry (talk) 07:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Escoperloit/Archive&oldid=1211804379"