Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abcdef7890/Archive

Abcdef7890 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

07 June 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

• Wertyunmb (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Habashiyuma (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• C. l. unable . e bo. t N. g (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Robertfranci (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Samarasimmareddy (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Rajasimmhan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Manage pass (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Skdklddhudke (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Skdklddhudke is one of the most recently-created accounts. Most of the rest are going to be stale, except for Manage pass, which was used as recently as May 2020, and Robertfranci, since the user logged in to that old account to continue their disruption. Since the user has threatened to continue their disruption, it's probably worth a look to see if there are any undeclared accounts, noting that they've had many accounts for no good reason. I'd also like that someone double-checks Manage pass, so we don't erroneously block based on a sock's potentially untrustworthy assertion as detailed below.

From Skdklddhudke's user page:

My other previous old accounts are Editingdanielbalaji, Managepass, Robertfranci, Wertyumb, Samarasimmareddy, Abcdef7890, Cluebot Ng, Habashiyuma. Manage pass created the page Gokul Anand(which was deleted) and the plot of Mahanadigan. Editingdanielbalaji renovated Daniel Balaji but the edits was reverted. Robertfrancii and Samarasimmareddy renovated Ashish Vidhyarthi and Vijay Shankar respectively, while Abcdef7890 vandalized NGK. Wertyunmb renovated Arasu. Cluebot Ng and Habashiyuma vandalized Wikipedian pages Vijay filmography, Vishal filmography, Kalaignar TV.

So, if we believe the user, they are behind a number of these accounts. I blocked the user because it appeared they were vandalising other editors' user pages, including 77Survivor's. I later noticed Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  In progress - Mz7 (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Skdklddhudke and Managepass are  Confirmed to each other, and the following accounts are very  Likely to Skdklddhudke:
  • Robertfranci
  • Gandharvaganalola Kaliyugaganathilakan (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• The rest of the accounts listed in this report are  Stale. Mz7 (talk) 01:23, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• I have  Blocked without tags the four accounts CU indicates are related. I am less inclined to take action against the accounts that are too stale for CU—just because the vandal says they own those accounts doesn't mean they actually are, and we can always revisit the accounts if they return to activity. For these reasons, I'm going to go ahead and mark this case as closed with no further action. Mz7 (talk) 01:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]