jun hong lu
The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.
- Editors involved in this dispute
- Zyw333 (talk · contribs) – filing party
- Ccctttttt (talk · contribs)
- Articles affected by this dispute
- Jun Hong Lu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted
Issues to be mediated
What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.
- Primary issues (added by the filing party)
- other editors put biassed and untrue contents based on un-reliable source, not genuinely interested making the page more informative but simply broke the link and reference
- other editors are deleting valid information without any consultation. If they are able to suggest evidences that suggests the information is not true,I can remove the information.
- Additional issues (added by other parties)
- Additional issue 1
- Additional issue 2
Parties' agreement to mediation
If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.
- Agree. Zyw333 (talk) 23:56, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- agree ccctttttt
Decision of the Mediation Committee
This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.
- Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite to mediation #4, "The parties must have first engaged in extensive discussion of the matter in dispute ... and discussion only through edit summaries will not suffice". While there has been a bit of discussion at the talk page listed above it can hardly be said to be "extensive". This request would almost certainly, moreover, have been rejected under prerequisite #9 even if there had been enough discussion. For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 10:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC) (Chairperson)[reply]