Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cajolingwilhelm

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 02:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 03:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC).

• Cajolingwilhelm (talk · contribs · logs)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

The dispute involves whether or not the National Broadband Network is a current event.

Desired outcome

The desired outcome would be a neutral decision and an end to spiteful editing. By raising this issue now I hope to enable the article to recover and continue to grow, it is important to have a large spectrum of users willing to edit articles. The NBN is one of the biggest projects ever undertaken by Government in Australia and it is important to get this article right.

Description

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries, other than to endorse them.}

Evidence of disputed behavior

1. Discussion on Talk Page of National Broadband Network

Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

1. Discussion page.

Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links to demonstrate that the disputed behavior continued after trying to resolve the dispute)

1. Just ended in relentless disagreement.

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

Other users who endorse this summary

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Outside view by

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by

Users who endorse this summary:

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.

Requested an inappropriate speedy deletion of Sean M. Burke, a published author and prolific Perl module contributor to CPAN, on the grounds that he hasn't heard of him.

02:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)