Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30

November 30

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 30, 2023.

Emotional damage

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Psychological trauma. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 22:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely other recently nominated "R from catchphrase" redirects, this phrase is mentioned. However, while this phrase was popularized by this YouTuber, there are multiple encyclopedic articles that discuss emotional damage, to the point where I think targeting this page instead of a page about damaged emotions would defeat the purpose of the joke being a joke in the first place. Wikipedia is not "Know Your Meme". Reduced affect display is one such alternative title, but there may be more suitable solutions. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:40, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment would Psychological trauma be a good alternative target? Emotional trauma points there --Lenticel (talk) 00:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Psychological trauma per Lenticel. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Psychological trauma per Lenticel. While the YouTuber has gotten a lot of traction with the phrase, I'm betting that in common language, when most people use the phrase, they aren't talking about the YouTuber. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 05:20, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, "emotional damage" is an internet meme and most people searching that term are probably looking for the meme. I am adding R from meme. SouthParkFan2006 (talk) 09:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per Dennis Brown. At most the current target needs a hatnote from there, but I'm far from convinced that the meme is the primary topic for this common phrase. Thryduulf (talk) 12:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Psychological trauma: we're not knowyourmeme. Cremastra (talk) 21:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

South park/kenny

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for the slash to be in this title; none of the other characters have a subpage-esque redirect per Special:PrefixIndex, and not a likely search term for that reason. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment this redirect has existed since August 2005, which is a very long time but it does post-date the subpage era. It was created as an article (well a 1-line substub), but as it would qualify for speedy deletion under criterion A10 if reverted to there is no issue with deleting that content here if that is the consensus of the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Pretty basic housekeeping to delete stuff like this. Per nom. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 05:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Somewhat plausible search term, especially for people who don't know Kenny's surname. SouthParkFan2006 (talk) 09:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Page was not tagged with an RfD tag until just now. TartarTorte 18:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TartarTorte: it appears that User:SouthParkFan2006 moved the page while the discussion was ongoing, so the tag is now duplicated across this and South Park/Kenny. Utopes (talk / cont) 20:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Utopes: Thanks for the history on that; I compeltely missed it trout Self-trout. I'm not sure what to do about that. I can remove the RfD tag from South park/kenny if you'd like. TartarTorte 20:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TartarTorte: No worries, I don't blame you. The page definitely needed to stay tagged by some means, and had you not brought it up I wouldn't have noticed it 🙏. It mainly was a message for SouthParkFan in the sense that "moving pages while discussions are ongoing is not a great practice because it derails the organization like so". I think you fixed the issue, and I appreciate you retagging the page. Not sure what the closer will do, so I'll probably wait for this to close and then re-nominate the capitalized version once out of the woods. Utopes (talk / cont) 06:49, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Top 20 motor vehicle producing companies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget.

No such lists at target article. (However, Top 20 motor vehicle producing companies is a {{R with history}}, and Top 20 motor vehicle producing companies in 2007 is a former name of Top 20 motor vehicle producing companies prior to a page move.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of assets owned by major automobile corporations

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#List of assets owned by major automobile corporations

Spider-Man: A New Universe

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article. In addition, third-party search engine results do not seem to provide any references stating that this redirect is an alternative or former name of the target article's subject. Steel1943 (talk) 20:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: As the author and only substantial contributor of the redirect, it can be deleted. It is an alternate title in a different language, though hardly searched for. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Enter the spiderverse

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an alternative name for the current target or Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse. May be best to delete this redirect an an ambiguous erroneous title. Steel1943 (talk) 20:12, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

SEPDP

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 21:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 3#H2ODP, this is a neologism unique to wikipedia. This term generally means in the context of cloud computing "secure and efficient privacy preserving provable data possession scheme"; however, we don't seem to have anything that specifically mentions that topic on wikipedia. Distributed file system for cloud seems like it could potentially have mention of it added, but it doesn't currently have it mentioned. This should either be deleted, or if data is added to Distributed file system for cloud, retargetted there. TartarTorte 18:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the discussion of Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_3#H2ODP it should be either deleted or moved to the WP: namespace as WP:SEPDP. JGHFunRun (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or retarget - Sorry, I missed the part about retargetting. JGHFunRun (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: If it is moved, whoever moves it needs to have the suppressredirect right, as a redirect from article space to wikipedia space is not WP:R2 eligible. TartarTorte 00:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the H2ODP verdict -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 14:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as before. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brownlash

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. With the possibility of being recreated when its book source gets its own article. Jay 💬 17:08, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection between the redirect and the target unclear. Steel1943 (talk) 15:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing this up. I've never heard of "brownlash" before in the context of climate change. Pinging User:Steveprutz who created that redirect 10 years ago. EMsmile (talk) 16:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find the reference to this term in my quick searching. StevePrutz (talk) 16:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. This is, sort of, an actual term - [1][2][3][4] coined by Ehrlich & Ehrlich in this book. A better local target would be anti-environmentalism, as that's basically its meaning, but the term isn't used there either. I'd suggest soft redirect to Wiktionary but there isn't an entry there and durably archived uses independent of the Ehrlich's book are hard to find so I'm uncertain if it meets the inclusion criteria there. If it doesn't then deletion is really the only viable option. Thryduulf (talk) 17:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That book is notable, if someone wants to make a page for it (at which point it'd make sense as a target). Elli (talk | contribs) 19:12, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree that an article about the book would make a good target for this redirect, if the term is mentioned. Thryduulf (talk) 00:23, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the mentioned book doesn't have an article yet. Can be re-created later. Or (second best solution) redirect to anti-environmentalism. EMsmile (talk) 09:52, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Spider-Man (2018)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#Spider-Man (2018)

Wikipedia:Phan The Anh (Travel Blogger)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted by Liz under criteria G6. Thryduulf (talk) 12:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia:Phan The Anh (Travel Blogger) → Draft:Phan The Anh (Travel Blogger)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Created in error by original creator who moved a seemingly self-promotional draft article in userspace to Wikipedia namespace. I then moved it to draftspace, however it left a redirect. I don't think WP:CSD#R2 applies here because it only applies to redirects from the main namespace. Fork99 (talk) 07:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WP:CSD#G6'd by another user. Oh and I noticed I technically created the redirect, so I presume I can also WP:CSD#G7 it? Can someone speedy close this please. Thanks, Fork99 (talk) 08:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Khulia Keng

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made-up spelling of the mountain peak. External search results are only from Wikipedia or mirrors thereof. Delete similar to the other redirect with the same spelling that was recently deleted at RfD. Jay 💬 05:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Cremastra (talk) 21:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unsung Prophents and Dead Messiahs

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Creator happy with deletion, no contrary views have been expressed. Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An obvious one-time mispelling from a user six years ago. Makes it confusing when trying to link this article to another.

there shouldn't be an "n" in "Prophets"

I already added a redirect to Unsung Prophets and Dead Messiahs to the full article with the "&" symbol. Or-Shalem (talk) 03:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Ca talk to me! 09:27, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as per the nominator's rationale. I admit I'm not adding anything to the discussion, but I think the nomination covers it. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Page creator here, feel free to delete! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of Mississippi's congressional districts by HDI

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#List of Mississippi's congressional districts by HDI

They fight, and bite. They fight, and bite, and fight. Fight, fight, fight. Bite, bite, bite. The Itchy & Scratchy Show!

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • They fight, and bite. They fight, and bite, and fight. Fight, fight, fight. Bite, bite, bite. The Itchy & Scratchy Show! → The Itchy & Scratchy Show  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unmentioned quote from this show. Excessive length and punctuation makes this a highly implausible search term and not worth maintaining. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hen-reeeeeeeeeeeee! Hen-ree Al-drich!

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While this catchphrase is technically referred to at the target page (the only one among the recent series of RfD nominations), this seems like a prime example of a quote that is not particularly in need of a redirect. In this case, the pattern of "exactly-13-Es followed by an exclamation mark, and hyphenations between each of the syllables in Henry Aldrich" is near impossible to replicate for anyone that isn't already familiar with the contents of the "The Aldrich Family" article already. Unless this is a canonical transliteration of what was being said in this phrase (13 Es and all), I suggest deletion. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Complete no-brainer, as per nom. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ye-e-e-e-s?

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphenating between every single e seems completely implausible as a search term for this radio and television series, and is never done (in its entirety) at the target page. Popping this title into a search engine gives absolutely all sorts of results pertaining to ANYBODY that slowly asks the question of "yes?". Does not appear to be a helpful title or spelling. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Far too ambiguous to be useful. Thryduulf (talk) 12:34, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

How do you dóóóóó?

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While this catchphrase is somewhat mentioned, there is next to zero reason for the extra unwarranted o's to be accented. This quote has no benefit as a redirect under any modification, but even then, the regular version of How do you dooooo doesn't even exist at that. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 02:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 12:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

San Joaquin River Estates, California

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#San Joaquin River Estates, California

River Road Estates, California

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#River Road Estates, California

You idiot!

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For a page that only mentions the word "idiot" once (and never as "You idiot!" per title quote), this general insult does not seem best suited to be a redirect towards one instance where it is allegedly used in a show. I'd recommend deletion personally as I can't think of a universal target that would be worthwhile. Idiot is a possibility, but the exclamation point makes this lean on the more implausible side. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I don't think the exclamation mark makes this more implausible than it would be without it, but I agree it's not a useful search term. Thryduulf (talk) 12:39, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Thank you veddy much

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#Thank you veddy much

Chuck, Chuck! It's Marvin! Your cousin, Marvin Berry! You know that new sound you were looking for? Well listen to THIS!

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Chuck, Chuck! It's Marvin! Your cousin, Marvin Berry! You know that new sound you were looking for? Well listen to THIS! → Back to the Future  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Comedy catchphrase that isn't mentioned at the target article. Excessive length, multitudes of punctuation, and a fully capitalized "THIS" makes this title near impossible to replicate even if someone wanted to search for "Back to the Future" by typing this quote. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I have a hard time believing anyone's using this phrase when searching Wikipedia. DonIago (talk) 04:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree. Besides the good points made above, the name of this film/musical is well known and easy to remember. No one would search for it using this quote. -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:51, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Implausible search term. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This quote (nor any part of it that I can spot) is not included at q:Back to the Future so it's definitely not one of the most defining pieces of dialogue from the film. That said, I disagree with the nominator that the punctuation is relevant to its use as a search term - it's what someone would copy and paste. Thryduulf (talk) 12:49, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No one is going to type this in the searchbar. Catchphrase way too long to be a useful redirect. SouthParkFan2006 (talk) 09:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to Q:The Big Lebowski. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 19:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

R from catchphrase not mentioned at the target article. The excessive combination of punctuation makes this title near impossible to replicate for a regular user, and its function as an unmentioned catchphrase is already dubious to begin with. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:32, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soft redirect. Once again the correct punctuation is not relevant (copy and paste is a thing) but as a catchprase that's not mentioned it's not useful as a redirect to the current target. It is included at q:The Big Lebowski though, so soft redirect to there has value. Thryduulf (talk) 12:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft redirect to wikiquote per Thryduulf. Cremastra (talk) 13:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Madera Country Club Estates, California

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#Madera Country Club Estates, California

Lake Madera Country Estates, California

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#Lake Madera Country Estates, California

Welcome to Good Burger, home of the Good Burger. Can I take your order?

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Welcome to Good Burger, home of the Good Burger. Can I take your order? → Good Burger  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

R from catchphrase that isn't mentioned at the target article, and does not seem to be a useful redirect. It is slightly more understandable as some other redirects from catchphrases (as it includes the page title in the quote itself), but the capitalization and punctuation feel implausible to replicate, to the point where this has dubious value as a redirect. People looking for this topic would search for the movie "Good Burger" itself rather than a two sentence gag, as this particular line is not mentioned at the target article anyway. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Very implausible search term. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very weak delete. Correct capitalisation and punctuation do not make a redirect implausible (copy and paste is a thing, and some people do use grammar when searching), and this is included at q:Good Burger so a soft redirect is possible. However, we can't redirect every quote and this feels like one of the less likely ones to be searched for here. Thryduulf (talk) 13:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as being an implausible redirect. The idea that someone would search this term instead of "Good Burger" doesn't seem realistic. Some catch phrases would qualify for a redirect or article (Where's the beef?, It's the real thing), but this falls short, in part because it already contains the name of the target in the phrase, but mainly because the phrase isn't as widely known to be somewhat notable itself. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 05:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Martin Dziewialtowski

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is nothing but bare mention of Dziewialtowski's name in the tournament tables at the target article. Either this person is notable and should be red-linked to encourage creation of a proper bio, or is not notable and should not be linked at all. If we linked all maybe-notable sports figures, with no articles, to mentions of their names in tournament/match tables, everyone would be a blue link, but readers would not be able to find any actual biographical information about them.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  01:21, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I don't think this redirect helps readers. I didn't find any evidence that Dziewialtowski is notable; there are a few short paragraphs about him in the Aberdeen Evening Express for 26 November 1997 ("Scot Martin's a Big Name", p.37) that could be used to confirm some details in an article if evidence of notability is identified. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Life Speaks to Me (lyric video)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 7#Life Speaks to Me (lyric video)

This isn't where I parked my car

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • This isn't where I parked my car → EuroTrip  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

R from catchphrase that isn't mentioned at the target article, does not seem to be a useful redirect Utopes (talk / cont) 01:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:47, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Not even important enough to mention in the article itself. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 05:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Turkish Nazi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Turkish nationalism#Neo-Nazism and neo-fascism. ✗plicit 03:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the Three Pashas have no link to Nazism. Omnibenevolence (talk) 23:26, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you say, it's not even an appropriate redirect to that section of the article. Further, it is a singular redirect (Nazi, not Nazis). This shouldn't even be a redirect, I would say creating "Category:Turkish nazis" would be more precise, but "Category:Turkish collaborators with Nazi Germany" already exists. Omnibenevolence (talk) 23:42, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_30&oldid=1188938375"