Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 00:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Cabinet of brunei → Council of Cabinet Ministers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Malformed nomination that went to AfD (WP:Articles for deletion/Cabinet of brunei). Rationale by nominator DownTownRich is "Cabinet of Brunei is available as a redirect and the current title has Brunei with lower case letter B. Curbon7 (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, lowercase is fine. No reason to delete given. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947, that's a perfectly plausible way to search for the target (I can see some users forgetting to capitalize the B), plus perhaps for that reason it's still getting a decent number of pageviews. Regards, SONIC678 15:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per J947. A7V2 (talk) 23:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Prussian holocaust → Holocaust (disambiguation)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target does not disambiguate "Prussian holocaust", and "holocaust" is not mentioned at Prussia. Is there a target better than The Holocaust? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:34, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I have no idea what this is supposed to mean. The article Prussian Holocaust, to which this redirect targeted at its creation, was deleted after an AfD in 2007. Maybe it is a historiographical POV to designate the evacuation of East Prussia? Veverve (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It almost certainly is. A link provided in that deletion discussion leads to an earlier AFD where it was mentioned that the now deleted article was originally a redirect to Evacuation of East Prussia. Checking that article confirms that the term holocaust isn’t mentioned so that would not be a valid target either. So based on the fact that it appears that the term isn’t mentioned the redirect should be deleted.--65.92.163.128 (talk) 21:10, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in a attempt to be thorough I can confirm that the Prussia and Holocaust denial articles don’t mention the term either.--65.92.163.128 (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - It should have been deleted when Prussian Holocaust was deleted. As indicated above no other sensible target exists. A7V2 (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G5 as block evasion of AndLikeThings. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:10, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• INE-LX1r → Huawei Nova 3i  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at all in the redirect target. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as the page creator was a sockpuppet of Shah Mohi. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G5 as block evasion of AndLikeThings. -- Tavix ^(talk) 19:07, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• INE-LX1r 9.1.0.333(C185E4R1P2) → Huawei Nova 3i  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at all in the redirect target. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 16:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not at target; not sure where this name originates. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 18:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is the version number of a random firmware update for this phone. Completely implausible search term. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 18:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete As the page creation of a sockpuppet of Shah Mohi. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Indigenous peoples of the Americas. ✗plicit 00:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Native Amerindians → Taíno  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't see a coherent reason for this to point to the page about the Taíno when there are so many Indigenous peoples of the Americas. I move that we retarget the redirect to Indigenous peoples of the Americas. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 15:48, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Indigenous peoples of the Americas per OP. This is an inappropriate redirect target, and the creator has been indef'ed. Meters (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Indigenous peoples of the Americas. The redirect to Taíno is bizarre. Carlstak (talk) 18:55, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Indigenous peoples of the Americas.4meter4 (talk) 17:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Law of Nine → Nonagon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. Related to The Law of Nines? 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. Today I noticed a long list of redirects for discussion had appeared on my talk page. All of them dated 24th of January except for this one which is dated today. Something fishy is going on. I don't know what any of these items is about and I have no memory of contributing to them. I suspect my account may have been hacked. I don't think "Law of Nine" is a real thing (although there is a "rule of nines" in Maths). I see no reason not to delete. wayland (talk) 22:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wayland Since you created this in 2005, it might be that you just do not remember. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, granted that it may have been in some context which has since been deleted or some context which depends on other links but I seriously have doubts about those possibilities because a whole stack of similar redirects came up for deletion at the same time and I don't recognise any of them. In any case I think deletion is the tidiest thing to do. If there was any hacking it was probably a long time ago and the culpret will be long gone. As for me I do little at Wikipedia these days but correct the occasional typo or grammatical error. wayland (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Nine (Enneagram) (Alt. Description) → Nonagon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible title. Created as an "article" with no apparent encyclopaedic content; then redirected as a vandalised stub pov fork instead of being deleted. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as an implausible search term; seemed to describe the ninth trait of the Enneagram of Personality. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Code ! → 33 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code " → 34 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code $ → 36 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code % → 37 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code & → 38 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code ' → 39 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code ( → 40 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code ) → 41 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code * → 42 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code + → 43 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code , → 44 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code . → 46 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Code / → 47 (number)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Another batch of nonsense redirects similar to the ones 1234qwer1234qwer4 and I nominated yesterday. These are redirects from "Character sign + Code" to the articles on the numbers corresponding to the decimal equivalent of these symbol's ascii codes. Numerous issues here, including them being implausible search terms, them being highly ambiguous (there are a number of character encoding schemes and "code" isn't even unambiguous - &Code could mean HTML character reference for example) and the targets being surprising and generally not helpful, these essentially target trivia about the numbers. I propose deleting them all. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was going to nominated them but stepped back and found you were already tagging them when I returned. These should either be retargeted to sections like Exclamation mark#Unicode code-points (with HTML) and Quotation mark#Unicode code point table or deleted as suggested, since directing the reader to the article about the number is not quite helpful. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think deletion is the best bet here, these seem to ambiguous and implausible to be useful. My first thought when seeing "Code !" was Negation#Programming language and ordinary language, as in the use of ! as an operator in code. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 11:49, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all: While the codepoint value of all of these are the values listed, it is not useful information and not really what redirects are to be used for. If one is trying to find the codepoint value of an individual character then there are articles for that such as the character page where it is listed in the infobox or article body (albeit in base 16). There is also ASCII#Printable characters to fulfill this purpose. I also find these to be implausible search terms. TartarTorte 19:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Spacing Modifier Letters. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• ˅ → Caron  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• ˄ → Circumflex  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not described at target; these are U+02C5 MODIFIER LETTER DOWN ARROWHEAD and U+02C4 MODIFIER LETTER UP ARROWHEAD, annotated in Unicode with "raised articulation" and "lowered articulation" respectively. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:25, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note they are:

U+02C5 ˅ MODIFIER LETTER DOWN ARROWHEAD fileformat

U+02C4 ˄ MODIFIER LETTER UP ARROWHEAD fileformat

so, spacing not combining. -DePiep (talk) 12:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: they do not seem to have obvious targets [1] [2]; e.g., no math meaning. What retargeting do you propose? -DePiep (talk) 12:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Spacing Modifier Letters seems to be most obvious; ˂ and ˃ by the same creator as this one have already been retargeted there. Either way, these have nothing to do with the current target (unlike U+02C6 ˆ MODIFIER LETTER CIRCUMFLEX ACCENT and U+02C7 ˇ CARON, which incidentally come just after the characters used in the nominated redirects), so they could as well be deleted if this target suggestion is deemed inappropriate too. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:26, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Ennation → Hyperoperation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 17#Heptation and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 April 26#Decation. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 2021 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting → 2022 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No meeting held in 2021. Peter Ormond 💬 08:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete: WP:CRYSTAL, misleading. However, the article mentions this meeting is the 2021 meeting postponed to 2022. Veverve (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Veverve's last sentence. The target article is the meeting for 2021, it was simply postponed to 2022. Sources referring to this meeting from before the postponement will call it a 2021 event, and a redirect needs to be in place to guide searchers to the correct article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix. A7V2 (talk) 23:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Violin family. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:04, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Fiddle and violin → Fiddle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• FiddleandViolin → Violin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:XY: Fiddle vs. Violin. Also, there was an article here that was WP:BLAR-ed in 2004 (see last revision as an article), but the article would probably not survive an WP:AFD. Steel1943 (talk) 07:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• These are Very Old pages (both were created in 2001), so it would be nice to retain them for historical continuity. Retargeting them to Violin family could work. - Eureka Lott 20:16, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget both to Violin family per EurekaLott. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay (talk) 13:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Damage Over Time (Computer and video game terminology) → Glossary of video game terms#Damage over time  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• DoT (Computer and video game terminology) → Glossary of video game terms#Damage over time  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• DOT (Computer and video game terminology) → Glossary of video game terms#Damage over time  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Damage over time already redirects to the same place. This is such a long and unnecessary disambiguation it is hard to believe anyone would search for it, it also does not correspond to the current accepted disambiguation (video games), therefore it should be deleted. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:59, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the first redirect since readers would have to type the phrase "Damage over time" before reaching it, which, as the nominators said, "already redirects to the same place". No comments yet for the other two. NotReallySoroka (talk) 23:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:53, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per others, and because it's inaccurate to call this computer terminology. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:48, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 2021 Prince Edward Island Liberal Party leadership election → Next Prince Edward Island Liberal Party leadership election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The party didn't hold its leadership election 2021. It will hold it in either 2022 or 2023. GoodDay (talk) 04:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. Veverve (talk) 10:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete per Tavix below and my initial rationale. Veverve (talk) 19:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per the article, it was to be held on November 13, 2021. It was planned to be a 2021 event, so the redirect is correct from that standpoint. References to the event from before it got postposed will refer to it as a 2021 event, so the redirect is in place to inform searchers that the event was postponed. This is helpful to prevent people from thinking there were two separate events, for example. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:13, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  The redirect not existing, would be helpful in preventing people from thinking there were two separate events. GoodDay (talk) 19:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Tavix. Previous RfD (please don't move redirects). — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix. A7V2 (talk) 23:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 2021 New Democratic Party of Prince Edward Island leadership election → 2022 New Democratic Party of Prince Edward Island leadership election  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The party held its leadership election in April 2022. GoodDay (talk) 04:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: WP:CRYSTAL, misleading. Veverve (talk) 10:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete per Tavix below and my initial rationale. Veverve (talk) 19:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It was initially planned for November 6, 2021, but was postponed. It was to be a 2021 event, so the redirect is correct from that standpoint. References to the event from before it got pushed back will refer to it as a 2021 event, and the redirect is in place to inform searchers that the event was actually just pushed back. This is helpful to prevent people from thinking there were two separate events, for example. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:11, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  The redirect not existing, would be helpful in preventing people from thinking there were two separate events. GoodDay (talk) 19:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Tavix. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:22, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix. A7V2 (talk) 23:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Dialect#Dialect or language. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Language and dialect → Language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

WP:XY: Language vs. Dialect. Steel1943 (talk) 02:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• A reader who searches for this is probably looking for information about the difference between a language and a dialect. We have information about that at Dialect#Dialect or language, so I suggest retargeting there. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 09:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Mx. Granger. A7V2 (talk) 23:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per above; Language or dialect is also pointing at that section already. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Alimentary Paste → Pasta  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This seems like an attempt to combine two different languages in one redirect. The redirect apparently refers to the French phrase "paste alimentari" which is in the article, but I'd think the translation of that world be something like "alimentary pasta", not paste. Since this is apparently a combination of languages, delete per WP:FORRED. Steel1943 (talk) 02:01, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Death thousand papercuts → Lingchi  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There's no evidence that "papercuts" reference this topic at all. Similar redirects like Death by a Thousand Cuts already target this article, and the nominated redirect seems like such an unlikely synonyms phrase due do the lack of the notable "by a" phrase and the use of the word "papercuts". Steel1943 (talk) 01:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comfort shake → Handshake  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There's no evidence in neither the target article nor on third party search engines that the redirect's phrase has any connection to the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 01:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 10:31, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Dot and Dash → PBS#PBS Kids  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Dash and Dot → PBS#Visual identity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Added. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target article. Could also refer to a set of toys made by Wonder Workshop, but not sure if it's worth redirecting there either. Probably best to delete to let search results provide the most assistance to readers. Steel1943 (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague. My Google search shows a mix of jewelry, Morse code and robots hits. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Dash and Dot redirects to PBS#Visual identity, although there is no mention there too. Jay (talk) 18:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 11:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: very vague (may possibly also refer to one or more coding function) and not present at the target. I think Dash and Dot should also be deleted for the same reason. Veverve (talk) 14:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete along with Dash and Dot. Much too vague. Doug Weller talk 14:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• It used to redirect to Special:Permalink/176495537#PBS Kids circle logo idents, which did not actually say in the first place that this ident was called "Dot and Dash". Uncle G (talk) 15:05, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Morse code -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 05:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow consideration for the late retarget suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:49, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: relisting to add Dash and Dot to this discussion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Gogole → Gogole Wielkie  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I was originally going to suggest retargeting this to Google, but taking a look at pl:Gogole Wielkie confirms that Gogole-Steczki also exists (and pl:Gogole does not). And from what I can tell, neither locality is referred to as simply "Gogole", so outright deletion may be a better option. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The qualifier is commonly left out from locality names in spoken usage: [3][4][5]. Similarly, in vernacular, Piotrków Trybunalski is commonly referred to as "Piotrków", and Biała Podlaska as "Biała". — kashmīrī ^TALK 11:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I have added disambiguation to Gogole-Steczki now. Crashed greek (talk) 04:46, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.