Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 4

September 4

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 4, 2021.

Tireless Contributor Barnstar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Only used once, on a talk page by the creator of this redirect. Points at a non-existing section. Unlikely to be useful. Stefan2 (talk) 19:52, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Jerm (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Not useful. ––FormalDude talk 04:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This useless redirect crosses namespaces. ―Susmuffin Talk 19:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Only confuses readers; useless for editors. ~~~~
    User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)     21:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very Weak Retarget to Barnstar#Other uses which talks about the use of barnstars on wikis, otherwise Delete as an unnecessary cross namespace redirect. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 12:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

19th Amendment Virtual Edit-a-thon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to have been created in the wrong namespace and then moved. Stefan2 (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Again, this useless redirect crosses namespaces. ―Susmuffin Talk 19:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as having no benefit to our readers. Probably could be speedied per G6 as wrong namespace / created in error. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 15:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1939 Illinois College Conference football standings

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G7. -- Tavix (talk) 22:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to have been created in the wrong namespace and then moved. Stefan2 (talk) 19:47, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; yes I created this template in the wrong namespace and them moved it. Jweiss11 (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1921-22 in German football

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to have been created in the wrong namespace and then moved. Stefan2 (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Wikipedia:Redirect#Reasons for deleting ―Susmuffin Talk 19:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Mainspace titles should not redirect to templates. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:39, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Indian gaming

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 12#Indian gaming

Cat Flushing a Toilet

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cat Flushing a Toilet → Parry Gripp  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: This looks like an obscure joke that has little to do with its target. ―Susmuffin Talk 19:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cattle Shoot

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No mention at target, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia; already attempted to be nominated for deletion by Randomran in 2008, though with an incorrect procedure. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Asianet Film Award for Best Actor - Female

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 22:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Incorrect name and unused, correct name is Asianet Film Award for Best Actress. Except this one, there's no other link for any other category in Asianet Film Awards, so non-notable too. This also appears as a misleading link in the search box. 2409:4073:28E:F972:24F3:F852:C68A:46EF (talk) 12:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kate Ambush

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 02:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target. Short-lived BLP microstub allegedly about a former wife of Thomas. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. I looked into the matter, and it appears that "Kate Ambush" is another name used, alongside "Kath Ambush" and "Kathy Ambush" for the name of Thomas' ex-wife in various gossip-sort columns. Given that redirects are cheap, and that this one has been viewed a few thousand times over the years, I see no real harm in keeping it, even though I personally find it all a little silly. If this is the eventually decision, we should probably create new redirects for the alternative names - or at least for "Kathy Ambush". BilledMammal (talk) 10:10, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:14, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per BilledMammal. Jay (Talk) 20:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Park Street District, Columbus, Ohio

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 13#Park Street District, Columbus, Ohio

Colors Telugu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 02:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Colors Telugu → Viacom18  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target; there has been no evidence so far on this channel's existence. Originally created as unsourced article. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: This redirect has no clear relation to its target. Furthermore, it might be a hoax. ―Susmuffin Talk 20:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Colors TV, the article on the whole network of "colours" TV channels that operate in India. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not mentioned there either. Viacom18 was the only logical target at the time of initial redirection since that was (and still is) where the list of all the Colors TV channels was located. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:48, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @JalenFolf: why was it removed from the list of channels? a google search turns up plenty of mentions/coverage in reliable sources verifying the channels existence, e.g. [1] [2] [3]. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 06:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Upcoming channel to come up in 2020, 2021 or 2022. There were couple of mentions on Wikipedia which I removed. Voot has a link for Colors Telugu but clicking on that takes to a page that is not Colors Telugu, but clicking on any other Colors link leads to the respective Colors page. There are more search results for "Colors wala Telugu Value". So fishy overall. Jay (Talk) 06:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The channel exists, however, it's not on TV but on the web ([4], [5]). Therefore, I'm inclined to keep the redirect with a mention on that page. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Both links are from 2019, and as can be seen from the links I provided, this launch didn't happen even in 2020, and is variously proposed for 2021 and 2022. One of the links you have provided is the same provided by 192.76.8.74 . Jay (Talk) 17:18, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_September_4&oldid=1044166638"