Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 10

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Tony Malloy → Anthony Molloy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

• Anthony Malloy → Anthony Molloy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Tony Mulloy → Anthony Molloy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not sure what to do about these redirects. They all point to the same disambiguation page. I couldn't find a suitable target for them, and I don't think it's useful to link to a page which disambiguates a different spelling from the one a user types in. Feedback on what to do with these redirects would be appreciated. Wug·a·po·des​ 21:08, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unnecessary, as they should be taken care of by the see alsos at Malloy and Molloy which are just alternative spellings of the Irish name derived from "noble chief". --Bejnar (talk) 02:13, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate. It is clear that there is no primary topic, and thus it should be disambiguated. The existence of one disambiguation page was noted for a retarget, and another one was created during this RfD. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 22:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thai Empire → Thailand  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Siam Empire → Rattanakosin Kingdom (1782–1932)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This page originally targeted "Siam Empire", and about two months later a bot fixed a double redirect to Thailand. I'm not sure that Thai Empire should be targeting Thailand. Since Thailand's borders have been stable for a while now, they don't have any colonies or exclaves, and their monarch is formally a king (not an emperor), searchers will be probably not be looking for modern Thailand. I am not sure where it should go, however.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  23:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Siam Empire really should also be discussed here, since there has been no clear consensus on the preferred target. I've tagged it and added it to the discussion. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate between the four historical kingdoms: Sukhothai Kingdom, Ayutthaya Kingdom, Thonburi Kingdom and Rattanakosin Kingdom. Of course, none of them were strictly speaking "empires", but, as I understand it, they did have systems of tributary/vassal states and borders that changed through conquest. —PointlessUsername (talk) 06:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: A disambiguation page already exists at Siam (disambiguation). Siam Empire should probably point there. But redirecting Thai Empire there would be a WP:SURPRISE. It could also refer to the Phibun-era idea of a unified Thai state, referred to as มหาอาณาจักรไทย and translated as Great Thai Empire, Greater Thai Kingdom, Greater Thai State, among others. This is described at Pan-Thaiism (though the name isn't mentioned there) and also Thailand in World War II. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate Thai Empire per WP:NOPRIMARY (I've created a draft); Retarget Siam Empire to Siam (disambiguation). --Paul_012 (talk) 05:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate Dartslilly (talk) 12:43, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 19:56, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Torontogirl.jpg.JPG → File:Torontogirl.jpg  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Housekeeping. CptViraj (📧) 03:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is an {{R from move}} in the "File:" namespace that doesn't qualify for {{Db-redircom}} (WP:R4). In essence, this redirect is harmless, and per WP:FILEREDIRECT, the redirect should remain. Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The old filename is evidently a mistake. Deryck C. 16:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I don't think this redirect is harmless due to the extension reduplication, which may create issues in some contexts trying to make the file a .jpg of a .jpg. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:53, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. PC78's comments put me on the fence, and I had been hoping for more comments, but given the amount of time that has passed without further input I'm okay with closing this as keep. (non-admin closure) _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:56, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Z (record label) → Zendaya  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target. Previously created as an unsourced article about a record label supposedly founded by Zendaya, it would appear that Zendaya has spent her career signed to Hollywood Records and Republic Records. Zendaya discography doesn't suggest that she has an independent label either. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:54, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The article refered to a collaboration with Labrinth and a soundtrack album. The Amazon listing for the song says ℗ 2019 Simco Limited and Z, under exclusive license to Hollywood Records/Republic Records, so it looks legit but it's not the easiest thing to Google. PC78 (talk) 00:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Yuri Tambovtsev → Novosibirsk State University  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, appears to be a non-notable professor who works or worked at Novosibirsk State University. Was converted from article to redirect on G5 grounds by Krakkos as the article was created by a sock and received nothing but minor copy edits from other editors. I think it would have been better to just actually delete with a G5, as there's nothing that a reader would learn from the redirection, and we don't have a convention for redirecting non-notable professors to universities the way we do for albums and musicians. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Ingles (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Inglés → English language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Spanish translation of English, delete per WP:FORRED. —Yours sincerely, Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 14:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Ingles (disambiguation), which lists two Inglés entries as well as Ingles (surname) (which covers the Inglés surname too), and also has {{wiktionary}} links for anyone who was looking for a dictionary instead of an encyclopedia. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 16:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak retarget per 59.149.124.29. Seems reasonable. Geolodus (talk) 05:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:F&D → Template:WikiProject Food and drink  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners. Magioladitis (talk) 07:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Christ → Template:WikiProject Christianity  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners. Magioladitis (talk) 07:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:GTP → Template:WikiProject Game theory  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners. Magioladitis (talk) 07:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:GTA TF Announcements → Template:WikiProject Video games/Grand Theft Auto/Announcements  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused and unnecessary now Magioladitis (talk) 07:10, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MaMTalk → Template:WikiProject Mammals  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners. Magioladitis (talk) 07:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I support removing this obsolete template. I created it when it was needed, and supported making it a redirect (and fixed its destination) when the original project it pointed to went defunct. - UtherSRG (talk) 22:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.