Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 March 26

March 26

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 26, 2019.

Silly String Storm

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:37, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Silly String Storm → Camp Lazlo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect was created in 2005 in response to now-deleted vandalism at the nominated title. The edit summary upon its creation was let's see if this redirect will stop it being recreated with nonsense. It was nominated for speedy deletion today by User:Koro Neil, who noted that "there is no reference to the subject on the target page." There is a mention in a 2005 talk page archive about the article formerly having a "Phony Episodes" section that included this title, but that section apparently was vandalism, as well. - Eureka Lott 23:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no mention at target. Polyamorph (talk) 11:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

J Politics Philos Econ

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:37, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

misleading typo created by mistake Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

J. Politics Philos. Econ.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

misleading typo created by mistake Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Do It for Her (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do It for Her (song) → Steven Universe  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at present target, I can't find a better target. Richhoncho (talk) 18:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Not mentioned at the target; implausible. Ss112 22:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Technical thrash metal

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:38, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Technical thrash metal → Thrash metal  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Misleading. Redirect term neither as such explained in nor to be considered synonymous with given target. Hildeoc (talk) 17:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lambda Omega sorority Norroena

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 3#Lambda Omega sorority Norroena

2019 Venezuelan coup d'état

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Violation of NPOV, no coup has happened or has been attempted.--Jamez42 (talk) 13:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: as per Jamez42.--MaoGo (talk) 13:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: will never be useful, not a thing. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:20, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep there is a strong argument one has been attempted, the army was urged to defect by both Gaudio and foreign govs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zellfire999 (talk • contribs)
  • Keep. If people have called it a coup and it is mentioned as such in the article, then it's a valid redirect. In fact, the lede currently says (with sources) that Maduro's government states that the crisis is a "coup d'état led by the United States to topple him and control the country's oil reserves.". -- Tavix (talk) 02:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 14:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Snowflake-in-Chief

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of nicknames of Presidents of the United States#Donald Trump. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snowflake-in-Chief → Donald Trump  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Seems more like an attack redirect than an actual redirect of any purpose. Goveganplease (talk) 13:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment – The name/redirect is based on a The Guardian piece: Brammer, John Paul (16 January 2017). "America: behold, your Snowflake-in-Chief". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2017. And is expanded on in Snowflake (slang). It is not intended as an attack.
    Also note There is a similar redirect for President Snowflake from the same section with the same intent/rationale from a CNN piece: Van Jones: Trump is 'President Snowflake', CNN Video, archived from the original on 19 May 2017, retrieved 19 May 2017 Whatever outcome should apply to both terms IMHO.
    If Donald Trump is not appropriate, perhaps a retarget to Snowflake (slang)List of nicknames of Presidents of the United States#Donald Trump instead would be better? - PaulT+/C 14:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No encyclopedic value. We don't create redirects for every nickname used in newspaper articles.  — Scott • talk 15:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Not every nickname, but those that have multiple reliable sources using the name qualify per WP:RNEUTRAL (note, references point to both snowflake-in-chief and president snowflake). - PaulT+/C 16:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or Retarget to List of nicknames of Presidents of the United States#Donald Trump and add these entries there. WP:RNEUTRAL applies. Thryduulf (talk) 16:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Note there is a discussion happening on the talk page of the nicknames article about whether the "Snowflake" nicknames should be included. If it turns out they are not to be listed there (though there isn't much coherent opposition to it currently) I think the redirect (to Trump or the nickname page, with a small preference to Trump) still qualifies per WP:RNEUTRAL. - PaulT+/C 19:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This redirect exists because of one columnist's op-ed. Not a notable nor an encyclopedic redirect. --1990'sguy (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    There have been multiple articles about the name including in The Guardian, The Atlantic, USA Today, and others. See my comment above, WP:RNEUTRAL, and the discussion at the presidential nicknames list. - PaulT+/C 07:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 14:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cypriot conflict (1955–64)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete (soft). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Redirect from a page move revert, the page has been moved back to its previous title "Cypriot intercommunal violence", because the undiscussed move to "Cypriot conflict (1955–64)""Cyprus crisis (1955–64)" appears to have been original research combining two distinct conflicts (the Cyprus Emergency (1955–59) and the Cyprus crisis of 1963–64) into one, which is not recognized by reliable sources and may be confusing (see discussion at Talk:Cypriot intercommunal violence#Title and scope of the article, and original research), and therefore should not be presented as a search suggestion option. All incoming links from article space have been removed. The modified redirect Cypriot conflict (1955-64) (regular dash instead of en dash) should be deleted for the same reason, as well as the talk page redirects. IamNotU (talk) 03:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note I've tagged and added Cypriot conflict (1955-64) to this discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note I've also tagged and added Cyprus crisis (1955–64) and Cyprus crisis (1955-64) for the same reasons. Working on removing incoming links Special:WhatLinksHere/Cyprus crisis (1955–64). IamNotU (talk) 14:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 14:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Allergology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:44, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Allergology → Allergy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

As such not included in given target! Hildeoc (talk) 20:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 13:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Brussels bombing

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 4#Brussels bombing

News18 Gujarati

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:42, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • News18 Gujarati → Network18 Group  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Persistent promotion target. Paid editors come in and revert the redirect back to the article, roughly every two months and usually sooner. scope_creepTalk 13:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I never released I sent that, this way, only six months ago. I should have checked. Hopefully the page protection will stay on for a good while. scope_creepTalk 18:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

For a Moment (Mariah Carey song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Moved to userspace without leaving redirect. (non-admin closure) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:18, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No mention on the album (probably somebody creating redirects for rumoured songs on upcoming album (not in the spirit of Wikipedia:Future event. I can't find any other suitable target. Richhoncho (talk) 12:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created this, and at the time I created it, I believed the track listing of Caution was sourced to include this track. I would not have made it without verifying it myself. Either it was later removed or I was very mistaken. Either way, this can now be procedurally closed, as I have moved the redirect into my userspace (in case it is a future title/for my own purposes) and not left a redirect behind (per page mover abilities). So this really no longer applies and doesn't need to be carried out. Ss112 17:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fall of the communism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fall of the communism → Revolutions of 1989  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Grammatically crude redirect that doesn't make sense since there are still extant communist countries as of March 25, 2019.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Fall of communism also redirects to Revolutions of 1989, and that is the primary topic on Google for both terms - yes the "the" might seem awkward but it is common in questions and so seems a likely search term - 83 pageviews last year and 17 in the last 30 days seem to back this up as well. Thryduulf (talk) 11:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, awkward phrasing and the pageviews do not inspire confidence that this is a plausible phrase. -- Tavix (talk) 13:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete of the redirect per nom and Tavix.  — Scott • talk 16:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_26&oldid=1138582805"