Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 July 31

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Coca-Cola slogans. --BDD (talk) 00:33, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• IYDKYDG → Coca-Cola (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Appears to be some 1990s internet meme related to the target, but the meme isn't mentioned there. TheChampionMan1234 23:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine target to List of Coca-Cola slogans, where it is now mentioned with ref. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:27, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• קפיטליזם → Capitalism (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Not especially Hebrew. TheChampionMan1234 23:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:NOT a translation dictionary. Capitalism has no particular affinity for Hebrew, despite whatever conspiracy theorists say. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:FORRED. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:28, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget/keep so both point at Geography of Mexico. Thryduulf (talk) 11:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• South Mexico → Mexico (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

• North Mexico → Geography of Mexico (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Please see Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_June_23#Southern_Mexico, pretty much the same thing. TheChampionMan1234 23:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Geography of Mexico and keep respectively. These are not proper article titles, so WP:RED does not apply. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:31, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close — redirect already deleted under G7 [non-admin closure] � (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Michael Lee Curran, → Jakko Jakszyk (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Recently created, implausible redirect (note the comma at the end) Fram (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 00:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• The Dreaming (band) – USA → The Dreaming (US band) (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Implausible redirect. A disambiguation, and then a dash (or hyphen, whatever) and the country? Inventing new formats can create many more redirects, but their use seems extremely limited. Not a plausible search term. Fram (talk) 09:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it is pure ignorance to suggest that redirects only exist for search purposes. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC).

• delete per nom; unlikely redirect, unlikely construct -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's a dash, and there's no dash key on standard keyboards. Altamel (talk) 23:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:32, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. There was no consensus that this is implausible, especially since BD2412's argument addresses only those readers who use the internal search engine with javascript enabled. This would normally default to keep, but Czarkoff's point about targetting the intended article rather than the dab page is a good one and so I will be retargetting this as a normal editorial action. Thryduulf (talk) 11:29, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Those Were the Days!(film) → Those Were the Days (links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure: keep/delete ] 

Implausible redirect (note the lack of space between the exclamation mark and the disambiguation). Fram (talk) 09:37, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep How implausible is it that someone would omit a space? Not implausible at all since they did. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC).
  
• Weak keep Seems possible, some sources I've found have an exclamation point in the 1940 film, others don't, so keep for now. I can imagine someone leaving out a space. Altamel (talk) 23:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: missing space in title of five words is not worth redirect. P.S.: if this discussion does not end with deletion even regardless the lack of arguments in favor of keeping it, it definitely should point to Those Were the Days!, and not to the DAB page. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 17:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, by the time the reader gets through typing "those were the d" in the window, the right answer will have come up anyway. bd2412 T 04:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.