Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 June 28

June 28

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 28, 2011

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as vandalism, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sexiness of Abraham Lincoln

This makes no sense. Probable joke. Delete.86.28.121.200 (talk) 00:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. Maybe someone relied on autocomplete when typing "sexity", and expected it to expand into "sexuality" but the autocomp thought it was a grammar mistake and turned the "-ty" syllable into "-ness." - ¡Ouch! (hurt me / more pain) 10:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • G3 Obvious vandalism, made by user with name "Lincolns log" who had no other edits. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Falkirk Season 2008- 2009

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There is no history to preserve. BigDom 09:11, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term given the extra space after the hyphen Jameboy (talk) 21:10, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Relisting. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Keep to preserve the attribution history, the page was created at this title. Thryduulf (talk) 09:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Keeping to preserve the attribution history only makes sense if the history is still under the old title. Since this page was moved using the rename feature, there are no content edits in the redirect's history and therefore no attribution history is lost if the redirect is deleted. Jafeluv (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Taelus (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Holden Commodore S

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Retarget to generic articles about the cars. (You may retarget to appropriate set index articles.) Ruslik_Zero 18:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hardwiring a link of a car's trim level to just one specific generation of road vehicle when several generations of Holden Commodore have an 'S' model is completely inaccurate. Created by an editor on a crusade to change a large number of piped links to redirects without due care as to their destination. --Falcadore (talk) 22:08, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Taelus (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retargeting would be acceptable, but set index articles could be more useful. Peter E. James (talk) 23:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've got no objection to set indicies if editors working in this area think them worthwhile and maintainable. Thryduulf (talk) 23:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Mini John Cooper Works S2000

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was No Consensus 1 month out I don't think were going to get much more. -- DQ (t) (e) 02:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Destination article contains no information at all on the Super 2000 rally car version of the Mini (BMW). The Super 2000 rally car is not generally similar to the WRC rally car version of this car. Created by an editor on a crusade to change a large number of piped links to redirects without due care as to their destination. --Falcadore (talk) 22:08, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Taelus (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Wikipedia:Driver

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Thryduulf (talk) 23:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from the Wikipedia space to the mainspace. Has been tagged for speedy R2, but I've declined it as inapplicable. However, I am submitting this redirect here, but I will not express an opinion on it.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 15:53, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Inappropriate cross-namespace redirect to an article that has no relevance to driving Wikipedia projects. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ok, I see the technical problem. It is an unfortunate bug that should have been fixrd ages ago. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      • It's not an unfortunate bug, it's a namespace alias, and it's working properly. It's just one of those times that the namespace conventions interfere with article titles. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 04:56, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        • I grant there may be different perspectives on whether this is a "bug" or a "feature." In my book, conflating metadata (namespace) with data (title) is a categorical error, and I don't make much distinction between errors of implementation and errors of design. Either way, it appears we will just have to live with it. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 May 23#Wikipedia:Kill. Sideways713 (talk) 19:37, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment this is why redirects need documentation. It doesn't look like Project:Driver even though it is, through namespace aliasing. 65.94.47.63 (talk) 04:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, possibly speedily. I have tagged the redirect and target with technical restrictions templates. —Kusma (t·c) 10:30, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_June_28&oldid=1038387638"