Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 June 23

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Disambiguated —GFOLEY FOUR— 02:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• California School → Chinese economic reform (links to redirect • history • stats) 

Redirects to the Chinese economic reform. Aren't there many other retargets like schools in California? JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 09:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate; indeed there are a number of "California School"s. Bridgeplayer (talk) 16:50, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Dab'ed and moved to Schools in California (which is probably clearer than this redirect).--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 15:51, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• ACNR → Aggregated diamond nanorod (links to redirect • history • stats) 

Unsure The abbreviation from Aggregated Diamond Nanorods is ADNR. ACNR might refer to aggregated carbon nanorod, but I'm very unsure of this. Either way, ACNR seems to mostly refer to Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation or various other things (see list), but diamond/carbon nanorods don't figure anywhere in the first few pages of the google hits. So I'm unsure about what is best here.Should we disambiguate even though we lack articles for most of these meanings? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 06:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Retarget to Magical creatures in Harry Potter. Ruslik_Zero 15:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Crumple-horned Snorkack → Dumbledore's Army#Luna Lovegood (links to redirect • history • stats) 

I'm nominating it because the target article includes no mention of "Crumple-horned Snorkack" whatsoever, though the books do link that creature to the Lovegoods to a small degree. I can see justifications for deletion, simply including some trivial mention of them in the Luna Lovegood section, or possibly making it a stub article (not sure that's the best choice, but it's conceivable)...but overall, I'm just unsure of the best approach so thought it should be discussed. – RobinHood70 ^talk 04:08, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Magical creatures in Harry Potter seems to be a better target. Having a redirect probably helps against creation of a useless in-universe stub. —Kusma (t·c) 07:55, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That works, I hadn't spotted that article. And yeah, I agree, a stub is definitely not a good plan. Unless there are any objections, or better ideas, I think that's our best bet. – RobinHood70 ^talk 07:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]