Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 November 17

November 17

Point of zero change → Point of zero charge

The result of the debate was Kept & tagged {{R from misspelling}}. -- JLaTondre 23:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an implausible typo. In addition, it redirects a possibly common phrase to an esoteric topic. Stan J. Klimas (talk) 21:42, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because it documents the pagemove. The fact that the page was originally put at the wrong title is clear evidence that the typo is not implausible. Furthermore, pagemoves are generally considered useful history. Looking quickly at google and ignoring the Wikipedia clones, I find no evidence "point of zero change" is a particularly common phrase. It does appear to be a technical term in it's own right (related to surveying) but if anyone in the future has the sources overwrite the redirect with real content, they can be bold and do so without deleting the redirect from the pagehistory. (I'd consider that myself but I don't consider any of the sources I found sufficiently definitive.) Rossami (talk) 09:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Trevor wiant → Bill Cosby

The result of the debate was user's contribution history confirmed that this was vandalism. Speedy-deleted. Rossami (talk) 09:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inflammatory redirect. This was the users only edit. A Google search yields no results: [1] meshach (talk) 20:07, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.