Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 August 28

A first edit by a new user, I can find no evidence that anyone would expect to find Minneapolis Airport under this name - I'm happy to be corrected, however. kateshortforbob 15:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. --Aarktica 23:38, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This should have been a Speedy. It was created as a joke related to Larry Craig--Appraiser 20:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - assuming it was a joke. Even if not, per the nom. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I would consider this as vandalism in relation to Brokeback Mountain, and will post the corresponding notice on his talkpage. ChrisDHDR 14:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - While the origin of the term may be in retaliation, the term appears: here, here, here, and other places. Alpha spa 20:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• One 404 Not Found error and two comments in blogs/forums. At best, it's a euphemism and neither source appears to refer to the airport in question. --kateshortforbob 21:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Ephemeral, not encyclopedic. Kablammo 00:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 01:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as Appraiser mentions, it's a joke based on the Larry Craig case. It almost qualifies as a speedy delete as an attack page. I wish I knew how to quit this redirect. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 14:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Snowcone anyone? - Mtmelendez ^{(Talk|UB|Home)} 13:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no Disneyland nor Disneyland Resort in Seoul. And there is no articles of them in the Page Seoul. It is confusing the Wikipedian. they should be deleted. --Boldlyman 10:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Keeps coming and going...([1] [2] [3]) just like vaporware. --Aarktica 23:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep - as your links show, this might be something someone might look up, therefore making it useful. ChrisDHDR 14:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The nominator indicated that there is no allusion to such subject at the target. Until such time when the subject comes into existence, the redirects are little more than an exercise in CRYSTAL-balling. --Aarktica 15:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: strong keep based on being linked? Please see the introductory section of WP:RFD. Being linked is not a reason to keep, let alone to emphasize such a keep as strong. Further, it would be confusing to enter Seoul Disneyland and wind up at Seoul, where there is no information about a "Disneyland" at all. Hence, this warrants deletion. BigNate37_(T) 15:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both per BigNate37. Someone looking for "Seoul Disneyland" is looking for a specific attraction, not the city in general. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 15:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete so long as "Seoul Disneyland" isn't covered at the target (Seoul). Melsaran (talk) 18:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see no connection between an American football coach and what I assume to be a type of helicopter. A Google search brings up nothing. CSD R3, perhaps? Black Falcon ^(Talk) 03:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I can't see any connection between these two either. If there is a connection and it is so obscure that neither Google nor the Dennis Green articel indicate what it is, it is hardly likely that the redirect is going to be useful to anyone else. It is much more likely that someone entering "High performance helicopter" is looking for an article on helicopters and will be misled by this redirect. Euryalus 06:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Euryalus and nom. --Aarktica 23:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep well known quote from a press conference. --NEMT 03:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • In light of the comments by BigNate37 and ChrisDHDR, could you please provide a source for the press conference. Thank you, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 16:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If it is a quote, it should be in the article where it would be subject to verifiability requirements. It isn't. Redirects are not an appropriate place to add sources, so we can't be asserting facts or attributing quotes via redirects. BigNate37_(T) 15:14, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - If NEMT can prove his comment, it will then become a likely term someone would look for, making it valuable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisDHDR (talk • contribs) 14:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Euryalus and BigNate. Perhaps even G1. Melsaran (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

there is no such game, as this redirect/article move was created as an act of Fan-Cruft. — Mark Kim (U * T/R * CTD) 02:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Aarktica 23:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as the fact there is no "Time Crisis 5" -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - since that this redirect was created as a nonsense. David Pro 20:43, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per all the above ChrisDHDR 14:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - There isn't a fifth game of this series. David Pro 00:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 01:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as misleading. Melsaran (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]