Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 November 29

The result of the debate was (Not very) speedily deleted Renesis (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made a spelling error of this redirect title, and I don't think anyone is going to type this redirect page at all. Gh87 21:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom (and both of the below nominations). --- RockMFR 00:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -- SilverStar★ 21:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Delete Renesis (talk) 17:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that nobody will type this title of a useless redirect page. Gh87 21:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• RockMFR nominates delete for this redirect page, as said above. --Gh87 03:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -- SilverStar★ 21:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Keep - necessary disambiguation title Renesis (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a useless redirect page because no one will type its title in the future. Gh87 21:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• RockMFR nominates delete for this redirect page, as said above. --Gh87 03:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. Some editions of Johnny Thunders' L.A.M.F. album as well as other sources have referred to the song as both plural and singular; also the Ramones' version of the song on the End of the Century album is referred to on the cover as "Chinese Rock". It's the exact same song. --CJ Marsicano 05:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Delete. Renesis (talk) 17:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're wondering why this exists, it's a reference to an old Batman comic that's been circling the Internet for awhile. Doesn't make it encyclopedic or useful. Crystallina 19:24, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Delete. Renesis (talk) 18:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These two article-space redirects point to a talk-space copy of a draft that is being kept for history purposes. Neither is needed anymore. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 17:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both per nom. Khatru2 20:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all per nom -- SilverStar★ 21:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Delete. Renesis (talk) 18:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect using multiple single quotes. Not a likely search term. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 17:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Exceedingly unlikely search term. Dar-Ape 22:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --- RockMFR 00:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom -- SilverStar★ 21:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Keep. Renesis (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary duplicate of Japanese quince. Fayenatic london 08:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a necessary redirect; Japanese quince and Japanese Quince are different pages and can be linked to separately; that they both redirect to the same article does not matter. - MPF 12:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon my persistence, I'm fairly new here. If the "Japanese quince" page exists, doesn't "Japanese Quince" find it anyway? (in which case the one with capitals on all words is unnecessary) Fayenatic london 18:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's found if entered in the "go" box, but not as a wikilink. -- Rick Block (talk) 19:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - necessary redirect. --- RockMFR 00:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Deleted. Product is not mentioned on target page. People looking for this would be looking for info on the product and not the company. -- JLaTondre 02:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What's a homehub? Seems like an implausible redirect to me. --Czj 10:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - It's a product name [1] and having the redirect in this capitalization makes it effective for any capitalization variant entered in the "go" box (like, for example, "BT HomeHub"). -- Rick Block (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The result of the debate was Delete. Renesis (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wrong spelling (capitalization), and the target article didn't exist anyway, so a disambiguation in parantheses is unneccessary Michael Drüing 12:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The target actually does exist. --70.48.111.146 23:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because I moved it there already. It's just the redirect from the old (wrongly named) page that needs to be deleted. --Michael Drüing 18:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --- RockMFR 13:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.