Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 November 2

The nominated redirect was Kept. -- JLaTondre 00:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an orphaned redirect page. All of its content is on the Splashdown page, and no pages link to this anymore. —Lantoka ^{( talk | contrib)} 00:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Remember that if everything is working right, redirects are supposed to be orphaned. Being orphaned is not a reason to delete a redirect. This redirect was created as the result of a pagemove. Prior to the move, the page had history. This preserves the links if/when an old page (containing an old link) has to be restored. Rossami (talk) 22:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Keep, classic {{R to disambiguation page}}. Kusma (討論) 23:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was Kept. -- JLaTondre 00:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Found this one when cleaning up a double redirect from Pleasant Grove, Texas. Created 10/4/06, so it's not old. Robertb-dc 23:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, and move article to this name. Maybe I'm missing something, but I think that not only should this redirect be kept, the article should be at Pleasant Grove, Dallas, Texas. Similarly, Hollywood is a redirect to Hollywood, Los Angeles, California. Could you clarify your reason for deletion? Picaroon9288 20:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, and reverse move per above and standard naming conventions. I think some of the more active members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Dallas have been (informally) creating their own convention which should have been discussed. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Name valid per Wikipedia:WikiProject Dallas convention, but the redirect should be there. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It'd be nice if someone created a formal policy. Pending the creation of one, WikiProject Dallas is holding a vote to determine consensus among its members. drumguy8800 C T 10:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was speedied. Please use {{db-r1}} next time, as "target does not exist" is speedy criterion WP:CSD#R1. Kusma (討論) 20:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Anthony Benis → Anthony M. Benis
• Anthony Martin Benis → Anthony M. Benis
• A. M. Benis → Anthony M. Benis

Delete - Target article was deleted. —Cswrye 20:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was speedied. Please use {{db-r1}} next time, as "target does not exist" is speedy criterion WP:CSD#R1. Kusma (討論) 20:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• NPA theory of personality → NPA personality theory
• NPA theory → NPA personality theory

Delete - Target article was deleted. —Cswrye 20:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 00:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. WP1.0
2. WP 1.0
3. Wikipedia 1.0
4. Wikipedia 1.0 project
5. Wikipedia Version 1.0

These are all CNRS; they are all extreme examples of self-reference, and the are all examples of "falling into the plumbing". Note that the well-formed shortcuts WP:1, WP:1.0, and various others exist already. Gavia immer (u|t|c) 19:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. feydey 22:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 00:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused CNR; like the above, this is more or less the definition of "falling into the plumbing". Gavia immer (u|t|c) 19:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete also per nom. feydey 23:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was Belongs at WP:RM. -- JLaTondre 20:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In a title, "up" is usually not capitalized, unless it is part of a verbal phrase, which it is in this case. Therefore, the title of the film is properly Bringing Up Baby. Please delete this redirect so that Bringing up Baby can be moved there.—Chowbok 19:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a case for Wikipedia:Requested moves. Please follow the procedure there. Kusma (討論) 20:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.