Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 May 3

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ballestrini.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 02:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VGirlScouts.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unlikely to be the work of the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 02:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balasaheb desai.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unlikely own work, resolution is of a thumbnail webgrab —SpacemanSpiff 03:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gulabraopatil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• unlikely own work, resolution is of a thumbnail webgrab —SpacemanSpiff 03:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep per Commons discussion about template. Exact source for image: [1]. — ξ^xplicit 22:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museovalenzuela.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly not self-created, as the uploader admits in the source. I'm not positive this should be non-free, though; while the source site carries a copyright notice, Commons's treatment of the subject says that in the Philippines, "Works by the government of the Philippines are not protected by copyright. However, prior approval of the government agency or office wherein the work was created is necessary for exploitation of such works for profit." Since we can't restrict to non-commercial, I'd say this is nonfree, and thus is a replaceable image of a building. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:36, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• The template for Philippines government works is called {{non-free Philippines government}} on Wikipedia but {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} on Commons, which is contradictory. See also discussion at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-PhilippinesGov. We probably need to wait for the outcome of that Commons discussion before we can close this one. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. This image is not found on valenzuela.gov.ph, but appears to be taken from Panoramio. — ξ^xplicit 22:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Museovalcityfront.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Identical to the above image, claimed as uploader's but sourced to the government of the Philippines. (ESkog)^(Talk) 03:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:17 th SAARC Summit Convention Centre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• From Panoramio with incompatible licence. Uploader claims own work, but there is no way to check. The Panoramio and Wikipedia usernames are very different from each other. Stefan2 (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Edmund Hillary.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Seems to be a recent painting of Edmund Hillary. Did the uploader paint the painting or just take a photo of it? Stefan2 (talk) 13:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fpposter3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 14:02, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Djposter4.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 14:02, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fpposter2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 14:02, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cairo T2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphan image is a well traveled rendering of the proposed terminal 2 at Cairo International Airport. Most likely uploader does not own copyright. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alex binnie 2012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source is {{bsr}} and the CC-BY claim only seems to refer to the text in the terms of service and not to text or images posted on Blogspot. Stefan2 (talk) 17:58, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

wordpress.com terms of service explicitly refer to permission to reblog anything, under share alike lisence, with a request to credit source.Statenisland777 (talk) 12:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SOFC.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This image was taken by me" + {{PD-USGov}} but no evidence that the uploader works for the US government. Stefan2 (talk) 18:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ravi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The old version showing only one person appears here with an earlier modification time, so it is possibly a copyvio. Stefan2 (talk) 19:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cambridge Dancers in John's College.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The author is identified as Claude Schneider (probably this person:http://www.claudeschneider.com/), and the photograph is very professional - but unusually for a professional commercial photographer has been tagged {{Attribution}}. The uploader is not the author (confirmation of name difference on User talk:Cudtcaptain#Conflict of interest). Surely then evidence of permission would be required (i.e. OTRS) but none has been, hence my listing here to get a second opinion. Acather96 (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salsa in a Cambridge College.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The author is identified as Claude Schneider (probably this person:http://www.claudeschneider.com/), and the photograph is very professional - but unusually for a professional commercial photographer has been tagged {{Attribution}}. The uploader is not the author (confirmation of name difference on User talk:Cudtcaptain#Conflict of interest). Surely then evidence of permission would be required (i.e. OTRS) but none has been, hence my listing here to get a second opinion. Acather96 (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cambridge Ballroom Boys.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The author is identified as Claude Schneider (probably this person:http://www.claudeschneider.com/), and the photograph is very professional - but unusually for a professional commercial photographer has been tagged {{Attribution}}. The uploader is not the author (confirmation of name difference on User talk:Cudtcaptain#Conflict of interest). Surely then evidence of permission would be required (i.e. OTRS) but none has been, hence my listing here to get a second opinion. Acather96 (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cambridge Dancers Photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This photo (while related to the three listings above) has an even more ambiguous copyright status than those above, as the author is listed as 'I (Cudtcaptain (talk)) created this work entirely by Claude Schneider.' Please see above listings for my reasoning and argument which are the same for this nomination. Acather96 (talk) 19:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Notre-Dame de Paris-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work. Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Pierre Geneva.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This copy seems to be earlier. Stefan2 (talk) 20:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Balayan National High School.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• School logo, doubt self-made claim. Acather96 (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MiscoloredandMisshapedModecaiandRigby.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Text on file information page suggests copyvios as Commons:COM:DW. Stefan2 (talk) 20:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montreal Panorama.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Author: Juju (http://www.travels-book.net/utilisateurs/juju.html) Website: http://www.travels-book.net" but no evidence of permission. The links are dead. Author name completely different from uploader's name. Shadows Commons. Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Semenov.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This has {{PD-Russia-2008}} with a link to a Russian website. I can't read Russian, so I don't know what it says there. It says that it is a pre-1944 photo, but I don't see why that would be enough to determine the copyright status. Stefan2 (talk) 21:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The file originally came from here, but I am not sure how to cite it. nobs (talk) 23:37, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should prove that at least one of the following is true:

• The photo was published somewhere before 1 January 1923, or
• The photo was published somewhere before 27 May 1973 and the photographer died before 1 January 1946.
• The photo was published somewhere before 1 March 1989, the photographer died before 1 January 1946 and the photo was published without copyright notice at least once before that date.

The source provided doesn't seem to list any year of first publication and it doesn't list any year of death of the photographer either, so it seems to be insufficient. If the photographer participated in WWII, the date 1 January 1946 might have to be replaced by a different date, not sure which. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CCN1 Staining.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source or licence. The file information page is broken and has no revisions. I tried adding {{subst:nsdnld}} to the file information page, but I get an error message whenever I try to edit the page. Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:World Gone Sour Title.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doesn't look {{PD-ineligible}} to me. Cf. Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:BF-Schriftzug.png. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.