Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 August 8

< August 7	August 9 >

August 8

File:Saudi 2005 Consumption.gif

I don't see anything on the source website saying this is PD, and this would be darned trivial to redo as an SVG (and with less hideous colors) B (talk) 04:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeorgeSMcGovern.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No real, original source. Extremely speculative license. Doesn't even satisfy the claimed license - no author is attributed. 72.88.34.144 (talk) 04:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Scecos in saudia arabia.jpg

Nothing on the source website says this is PD. (unless all works of the Saudi government are PD?) B (talk) 04:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeorgeSMcGovern.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:29, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned on the picture, anyone was free to upload an image on this website. Also, the picture was attributed to no one. If it was copyrighted, the holder of the image would have been listed beneath it. I listed the original source and properly attributed the photo to NoHillaryClinton.com.--Tilden76 (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Plaza bonita sky view.jpg

Image appears to be a screenshot of Google maps (identical aerial photograph with Google's, map labels are identical with Google's and image's copyright noticeable at bottom of image; however the uploader claims to be the copyright holder. Djrun (talk) 18:28, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]