Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:YTLiamStoneback/sandbox/Dani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 14:43, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:YTLiamStoneback/sandbox/Dani

Copyvio of the Dani article from Wikitubia. Jurta talk 08:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Wikitubia is released under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 Licence, which is the exact same licence that we use. The content here is therefore completely compatible with Wikipedia. All that this needs is appropriate attribution adding, using something like {{Fandom content}}. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 17:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Noting for the record that I removed a G12 tag by @Plutonical since this content is under a compatible open source licence. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 17:10, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have now added the required attribution to the article. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 17:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for the CSD issue, IP. I wasn't actually able to access Wikitubia because fandom is blocked on my school network, so I took Jurta's word for it. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 17:26, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Plutonical If you're going to tag something for speedy deletion then at least put the bare minimum amount of effort in and check that the page actually falls under the criteria you've tagged it for deletion under! What happened to your commitment to stay out of Wikipedia space until you have the experience to avoid being disruptive? [1] 163.1.15.238 (talk) 11:59, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I did have the necessary experience, although I should probably reconsider that now, and maybe refrain from anything that I'm not completely certain about. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ 12:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per unregistered editor. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:05, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not a copyvio, and the content is properly attributed now. Glades12 (talk) 18:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep although I'm not too hot on the idea that this will ever make it to mainspace. casualdejekyll 20:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.