Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tamara Conniff/Tamara conniff
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
User:Tamara Conniff/Tamara conniff
This is the user's copy of deleted Tamara Conniff which was an expired PROD with the concern Autobio puff piece with no references, no indication of notability. I can find lots of very minor mentions, but not significant coverage. The creator appear to be the subject herself. ---- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Notability is not required in userspace. And userspace is one place where having oneself be the topic is pretty much expected. Collect (talk) 14:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
- Delete Collect is correct that notability is not required in userspace. However, WP:FAKEARTICLE says, "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia." (mine emphasized)
This userspace copy has been created by a single-purpose account whose sole purpose is to promote Tamara Conniff; no other edits have been made from this account. This userspace draft of a previously deleted article about a non-notable individual violates the policy WP:NOTWEBHOST and should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 22:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.