Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Davis1997
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Davis1997
Appears to be an old copy of a mainspace article. WP:COPIES Flounder fillet (talk) 13:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - As per nom, this is an old copy of an article. This copy was made by an editor who made one edit, creating this copy, and then departed. The user may have used it for a school paper, but that is not important. Some of the other nominations by the nominator are similar illustrations. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question - User:Flounder fillet - Do you have a query that finds these copies by an editor who made one copy and then disappeared? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- The "potential U5s" database report (well, actually a modified version of it, because it's broken right now) detects these along with U5s (and a wide range of other strange user behaviour, I'd say about half of the English-language user pages in it's output are deletion-worthy) because it looks for long userpages of users with no mainspace edits. Flounder fillet (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also everything I nominated today is from ordering Cryptic's query by least edits, except "Harry Potter with Tin Tin", which I found because it is one of the longest userpages found by this query in all of Wikipedia. Flounder fillet (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Also everything I nominated today is from ordering Cryptic's query by least edits, except "Harry Potter with Tin Tin", which I found because it is one of the longest userpages found by this query in all of Wikipedia. Flounder fillet (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- The "potential U5s" database report (well, actually a modified version of it, because it's broken right now) detects these along with U5s (and a wide range of other strange user behaviour, I'd say about half of the English-language user pages in it's output are deletion-worthy) because it looks for long userpages of users with no mainspace edits. Flounder fillet (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Keep 'em coming.—Alalch E. 23:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.