Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-01-18 Shia Islam
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | Shia Islam |
| Status | closed |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Perey |
| Parties involved | Namez 2007 |
| Comment | Applicant did not respond. |
[[Category:Wikipedia Medcab closed cases|Shia Islam]][[Category:Wikipedia medcab maintenance|Shia Islam]]
Mediation Case: 2007-01-18 Shia Islam
Please observe Wikipedia:Etiquette and Talk Page Etiquette in disputes. If you submit complaints or insults your edits are likely to be removed by the mediator, any other refactoring of the mediation case by anybody but the mediator is likely to be reverted. If you are not satisfied with the mediation procedure please submit your complaints to Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal.
Request Information
- Request made by: Perey 07:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Where is the issue taking place?
- Shia Islam
- Who's involved?
- Namez 2007
- What's going on?
- I made some edits to Shia Islam. Without discussion, often without edit comments, the above editors have either reverted my changes or merely reintroduced disputed points. I've tried to engage them on the talk page, and also on Namez 2007's talk page.
- What would you like to change about that?
- It's proven impossible thus far to engage anybody in discussion of the edits in question. I'm not much fussed about losing the debate, as long as there actually is some debate. I basically need help on how to handle this!
- Would you prefer we work discreetly? If so, how can we reach you?
- Work as openly as you like. My talk page or the article talk page would be fine.
Mediator response
Compromise offers
This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.
Discussion
While using the talk page of the article in question to solve a dispute is encouraged to involve a larger audience, feel free to discuss the case below if that is not possible. Other mediators are also encouraged to join in on the discussion as Wikipedia is based on consensus.