Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Kuala Lumpur/1

Kuala Lumpur

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Removed all uncited material; cannot see anything that needs an update, so keeping. The article is on the lower end of the GA criteria, but still meets it. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A GA from 2008. Some stuff is uncited while other stuff might need updates. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anything specific? Which items cannot be handled through simple bold editing, and instead require a GAR? CMD (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Some specific things include
"The infrastructure development in the surrounding areas such as the Kuala Lumpur International Airport at Sepang, the creation of the Multimedia Super Corridor and the expansion of Port Klang further reinforce the economic significance of the city.""
"Other important economic activities in the city are education and health services. Kuala Lumpur also has advantages stemming from the high concentration of educational institutions that provide a wide-ranging of courses. Numerous public and private medical specialist centres and hospitals in the city offer general health services, and a wide range of specialist surgery and treatment that caters to locals and tourists."
"The entertainment hub of the city is mainly centred in the Golden Triangle encompassing Jalan P. Ramlee, Jalan Sultan Ismail, Jalan Bukit Bintang, Ampang Road and Bintang Walk as well as Kuala Lumpur's largest nightlife and entertainment hotspot, TREC KL. Trendy nightclubs, bars and lounges, such as Marini's on 57, Skybar at Traders Hotel, the Beach Club, Espanda, the Hakka Republic Wine Bar & Restaurant, Hard Rock Cafe, the Luna Bar, Nuovo, Rum Jungle, No Black Tie, the Thai Club, Zion Club, Zouk KL, Club Kyō, Dragonfly KL and many others are located here."
"As of the 2010 Census, the population of Kuala Lumpur was 46.4% Muslim, 35.7% Buddhist, 8.5% Hindu, 5.8% Christian, 1.4% of unknown affiliations, 1.1% Taoist or Chinese religion adherent, 0.6% follower of other religions, and 0.5% non-religious.
Kuala Lumpur is one of the three states where less than 50% of the population are self-identified Muslims, the other two being Penang and Sarawak."
Among many other uncited statements. Also the lead is supposed to be four paragraphs max per MOS:LEAD Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All very easily fixed. I would recommend doing some sort of WP:BEFORE before nominating an article for GAR, Onegreatjoke. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did and that's why I nominated it here. there are at least 10 uncited paragraphs that very much need to be addressed along other uncited sentences. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Kuala_Lumpur/1&oldid=1134387849"