Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 July 10

< July 9	July 11 >

July 10

File:Kasra Mehdipournejad, Nov 2020.jpg“.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality, blurry. Screenshot per EXIF. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as orphaned and probably not free judging by it being screenshotted from elsewhere. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wend 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-free image of a living person. The article in which this image is used even says that it's from an ITV program. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 23:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JOS-VANTYLER.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jos Vantyler on set photograph.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:23, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TonysAwards2017 20171009190738 (1).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Summer Strallen Oscars 2020.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:48, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jin Pic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, no metadata. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:53, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Harry Roque.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work. EXIF states "21 June 2016", information table states "2017-07-01" and upload date states "23 February 2017" --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Harshdeep Kaur Close up.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a bunch of images to commons that came from different cameras and all files are of varying sizes. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Simsohal. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Harshdeep Style.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a bunch of images to commons that came from different cameras and all files are of varying sizes. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Simsohal. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Harshdeep in UK.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a bunch of images to commons that came from different cameras and all files are of varying sizes. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Simsohal. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Harshdeep Kaur UK Concert 2018.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a bunch of images to commons that came from different cameras and all files are of varying sizes. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Simsohal. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jagmeet bal with sukhshinder shinda and jazzy b.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a bunch of images to commons that came from different cameras and all files are of varying sizes. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Simsohal. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jagmeet Bal with cricketer Harbhajjan Singh.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded a bunch of images to commons that came from different cameras and all files are of varying sizes. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Simsohal. Doubtful own work. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imperial College London monotone logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by c:File:Imperial logo.png. This wordmark is purely plaintext without any special styling, as such, it is below c:COM:TOO UK. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ingredion logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by File:Ingredion.svg. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:40, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as pretty much identical to the other image. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 00:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Inoxv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, doubtful own work per uploader's talkpage. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Navratri1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small, low res, doubtful own work per uploader's talkpage. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:59, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AEW Blackpool.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Nominator retracted support for deletion, and nobody else supported deletion. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:18, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support deletion~~—uploader has tagged this image as {{PD-textlogo}}. I do not believe that the image is below the threshold of originality. Orphaned, so would fail WP:F5 if relicensed to nonfree. House Blaster^talk 00:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC) See below for new !vote House Blaster^talk 21:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseBlaster: short lines of text, regardless of the font/method of production, do not meet TOO. There may be other protections (such as trademarks and signatures), but it cannot be copyrighted. Buffs (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Appropriately tagged. ~~Certainly could be~~ Now used on Blackpool Combat Club. Buffs (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Buffs: Personally, I see more than just text in the image—there are bits of "blood" that seem to add to the image to the point it is no longer simply BCC written in fancy letters. Given that the file is now in use, I would change my !vote to relicense to nonfree. House Blaster^talk 21:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Even those bits as stray marks cannot help it attain copyright. It is no different than stray marks on a signature (which also cannot be copyrighted). Think of it this way: if intentional marks on a design in this manner don't help it attain copyright, why would sloppiness help it attain copyright? Buffs (talk) 15:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Even as the image is now put into use, the question of whether this design passes the threshold of originality still remains.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To my layman's eyes, this looks like a hand-painted sign of just letters. If a signature can't attain copyright, less than that certainly cannot. Buffs (talk) 23:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nitty Scott Press.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr washing as discussed on Commons: c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nitty Scott Press.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 18:29, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom/Commons discussion. Buffs (talk) 07:42, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Exterior-of-the-titanic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 July 20. ✗plicit 11:26, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exterior-of-the-titanic.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lesiëm (logo).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The background likely puts this image above the threshold of originality. However, I don't believe it qualifies for fair use either as the copyrighted background seems to be specific to a video. The actual logo is a simple wordmark that could be easily recreated. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:57, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.