Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 June 20

< June 19	June 21 >

June 20

File:Australia Post Keypas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 28. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australia Post Keypas.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Max Beckmann - 'Carnival', Oil on canvas, 1943.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Maybe a visual work of art would "speak for itself" on a dedicated article, but the question of how it meets WP:NFCC#8 under its current use has not been addressed by the sole keep comment, and precedent is that it does not. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Used in three articles, and none of them discuss the work, so omission would not be detrimental to the reader's understanding of the article subjects (WP:NFCC#8). None of the rationales are specific to each use but are the same thing repeated with the article changed (WP:NFCC#10c). — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Important and historical work of art. A visual work of art speaks for itself; does not need further explanation as acknowledged by the Wikipedia Foundation years ago...Modernist (talk) 11:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SCruzFlagcolor.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NFCC applied to free image: California municipal government work. Xeror (talk) 08:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SmarTone logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 28. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:47, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:SmarTone logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1967.NRP.flyer.has.your.mother.been.raped.yet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that material is in an FBI file doesn't in this instance transfer the copyright to the US Fedral Government does it.

(I'd also appreciate there being a fuller justification as to why material like this is required in an academic context. ) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1951.12.27.eustace.mullins.letter.to.womens.voice.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Press clipping, the fact that it's in an FBI file, wouldn't necessarily transfer the copyright to the Federal Government.

(I am also concerned, that whilst English Wikipedia is not censored, the file description page contains little of nor infomaiton as to why content of this kind is justified in an academic context.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1963.01.11.NRP.america.first.rally.advert.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– uploaded by Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The fact that third-party content is in an FBI fie, does not necessarily imply the copyright transferred to the Federal Govt.

Also noting that whilst English Wikipedia is not censored, the file description page has no information explaining or explaining or justifying why inclusion of content like this is acceptable in an academic context. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skyarts.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Stefan2 (talk) 16:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFCC#8. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Now Now singles cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a cover of The Now Now rather than a cover for Humility (song). As such, it should only be used in The Now Now but not in Humility (song). Stefan2 (talk) 16:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, the single cover is a duplicate of the album cover. Lazz _R 19:33, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CSD#F1 — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stothert Fullers Earth.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The {{imagewatermark}} suggests that this wasn't created by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Dubious claim of own work. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wipr-prtv.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Stefan2 (talk) 17:07, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFCC#8. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WashingtonEagles.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NFC#cite_note-4. Stefan2 (talk) 20:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFCC#8. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Evolution of PCP - Design and Initial Drawings.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Three logos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯ xplicit 00:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (except on each others' file information pages), no foreseeable use. Draft:Fixed Income Analysts Society was deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IntersectionOfCTSectionWithNLocalizer.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:08, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.