Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 June 29

June 29

File:2012-REPUBLICAN-PRIMARIES-DELEGATES.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 13:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:2012-REPUBLICAN-PRIMARIES-DELEGATES.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Themane2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

no longer needed, superceded by better picture. Themane2 (talk) 03:04, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AphexTwinComeToDaddy,PappyMix.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:AphexTwinComeToDaddy,PappyMix.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AlexOvShaolin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8, no suitable rationale for uploading a sound sample which is not supported by any third party critical commentary, thus failing to aid reader's in understanding why it is to be included in the article. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 10:08, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do I need to expand the NFCC#8 part of the rationale or find an alternative, or else? }IMr*|(60nna)I{ 14:12, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I just moved the audio sample from the tracklist to the "Overview" section, so that it meets NFCC#8. Look at this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Come_to_Daddy&diff=615723732&oldid=613927787 }IMr*|(60nna)I{ 18:10, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Krist Novoselic PXL-2000.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krist Novoselic PXL-2000.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Decampos (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unknown provenance image used to show someone known with a certain camera. Easily replacable with a freely licensed image. Fail WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Various coats of arms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: 'Delete all as replaceable based on the same blazon. TLSuda (talk) 00:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dulwich College Crest.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Coat-of-arms-university-of-miskolc.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Chester Arms.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Catania-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Brescia-Stemma.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Crest of Diocese of Phoenix.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

These were tagged as replaceable fair use, but the admin declined the request. As these are coats of arms, they are automatically replaceable, as someone could easily create a freely licensed replacement based on the same blazon. See for example Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 July 17#File:Arzachena-Stemma.png. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Frontier: First Encounters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete all but one per WP:NFCC#3a. TLSuda (talk) 00:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:First encounters1 320.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:First encounters3 320.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:First encounters2 180.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

We do not need three screenshots. Therefore, two of them should be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They give a proper representation of what the game is about, so I think they should stay. HyperspaceCloud (talk) 16:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One image is enough to do this. See WP:NFCC#3a. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Poster1990.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poster1990.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Luiscarson01 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ClubPuebla44.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ClubPuebla44.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Luiscarson01 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Per WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: 'Delete second logo per consensus. TLSuda (talk) 00:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suva-FC-Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Suva FC.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The article should only contain one logo, so one of these should go away. At Talk:Suva F.C.#Suva F.C. Logo, User:Tucoxn suggests that File:Suva FC.png is a hoax, meaning that it is File:Suva-FC-Logo.jpg which should be kept. As I don't know anything about the topic, I have listed both here. Keep in mind that only one of the files should be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Also note that File:Suva FC.png has two different logos in the history of that file. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep File:Suva-FC-Logo.jpg. Delete File:Suva FC.png. I currently live in Suva and I have not seen the png version on team uniforms, the official team web site, or the Fiji Football Association (FFA) web site. This version is also not available on clothing around Suva. This leads me to believe that the png version is a fan-created graphic for a team that does not often wear a logo on its uniforms (it may or may not be a hoax). As noted on the Suva F.C. article's talk page, several recent photos indicate that the logo has not changed, although it is very hard to see (the players have a b/w logo on their right chest in the fijilive.com photo and the FFA logo on their left chest): from facebook, and this image from this article (dated 29 June 2014). I am willing to be proven wrong, as the old/jpg graphic is of poor quality and lacks detail; however, proof of change should come in the form of the image's inclusion on some official communication or clothing from Suva F.C. or the Fiji Football Association. - tucoxn\talk 23:43, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep File:Suva-FC-Logo.jpg. Delete File:Suva FC.png. Seems like you are right. I uploaded better version of the logo they have on their shirts. Found here. Yxifix (talk) 02:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the differences were resolved here. I'm satisfied with the change made by Yxifix. Also pinging Fenix down, who was active in the discussion on my talk-page about this image a while ago. - tucoxn\talk 22:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2014_June_29&oldid=1141914921"