Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 May 29

< May 28	May 30 >

May 29

File:Lunch in commune.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid PD tag: the author died in 1976 [1]

Probably speedy deletion, but I got confused with the rules. - Altenmann >t 06:30, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DrexelDrive.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzzy, low quality Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heizel Stadium Disaster 29 May 1985.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy close, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:16, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original source and copyright holder not identified. As a press image which may fail NFCC#2, this is doubly important. J Milburn (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please proceed with the deletion. Sorry for the trouble. --Alberto Fernandez Fernandez (talk) 19:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Padmarajan during his early career.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating similar file:

Photograph of a photograph, original is claimed to be from his early career which started in 1975 (subject was born in 1945), and the original author/source is not known. Doesn't qualify for PD based on age and no known release for original. —SpacemanSpiff 15:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I've taken the liberty of delinking the former file and having it point to the Commons version (which is also up for deletion)[2][3] because this image doesn't appear to qualify for fair use. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I nominated it there too, just tells me that I should do these things when I think of it and not just watchlist the images to nominate at a later date! —SpacemanSpiff

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Curiousgeorgetitlecard91611.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been blown up from its original size, which makes it look all dull and pixelated. I also removed it from the Curious George (TV series) article which therefore makes the image an orphan since no articles link to it. Interlude65 (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Linux-android--replicant--replicant banner.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Author is wrong (replicant community isn't precise enough), this logo seems outdated and is anyway not the official one. Please see the details on: http://redmine.replicant.us/projects/replicant/wiki/ReplicantArtwork I will gladly update our new logo with the correct meta-infos. PaulKocialkowski (talk) 20:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wonderparty.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The bold "not official artwork" would seem to suggest that this is not actually the album cover. J Milburn (talk) 22:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.