Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 April 13

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DMangold.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by JazzCarnival (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Poor quality orphan without description. User blocked indefinitely so unable to confirm notability of individual in the image. Haruth (talk) 00:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mikka.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Altenmann (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Personal photo of a permanently banned and desysopped former administrator. Virtually zero chance of him coming back and this image has no value to the project. Burpelson AFB (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DavidLarsen.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by ArtVandalay8 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Poor quality orphan. No description to confirm identity or notability of individual. User no longer appears active to confirm. Haruth (talk) 01:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. User's only contribution is uploading this image, and it is self-made. Looks like a self-photo of an inactive user to me. -Frazzydee|✍ 19:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AMindOfItsOwnSample.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hotwiki (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Content of song not discussed in article WP:NFC Dawnseeker2000 02:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parlorbedroomsink91226.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pepso2 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Even if an example is needed for the article, which I do not concede, we already have one and any more patently fail NFCC.3a ÷seresin 05:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:American Lion, Modern Lion.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Simham Kherdejam (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use, likely copyvio, judging by logo in bottom right corner. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• It would be quite a nice image to have on American lion, and it seems to me rather a high-quality image. But I agree with you about the apparent copyvio. A different copy of the same image can be found on the cryptomundo.com blog, here, which says it is by natural history illustrator Carl Buell. Delete. Jheald (talk) 09:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GM AFG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tauheed ashraf (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, not particularly useful to Wikipedia. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:22, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• It would appear to be a picture of Greg Mortenson, in Afghanistan. Possible future use on that article? I'm adding a note to the article talk page, to see if anyone wants it kept. Jheald (talk) 09:43, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for now: This image is now properly licenced and sourced following the file deletion for being unfree. Now that a valid OTRS ticket and permission has been provided, is it not a bit hasty to nominate it for deletion just six days after OTRS restored the image? In fact several images nominated on the same day Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 15 have still not been closed and here we are already nominating this one again. Who knows, maybe some other use can be made for an image showing a group of Afghani men with a western visitor, or perhaps the uploader did not get around to adding it to the Greg Mortenson article yet. I did not know we are now actively purging properly licenced orphans. There are many other far less useful badly licenced images that should be nominated long before this one. ww2censor (talk) 13:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom Warder (Large).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Venturian (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• keep should be used on a Tom Warder article, which User:Venturian will eventually complete, as it is currently a draft in her userspace. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• comment Same image is on commons:File:Tom Warder (Medium) (Medium) (2) (Large) (Large) (Large).jpg. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to commons, replacing the image that Pieter found. This image is better quality than the one on commons. -Frazzydee|✍ 22:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vatican Embassy in Sao Paulo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Filhodapuc (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons, page commons:São Paulo (city) Jheald (talk) 09:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BrownTowhee2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Seglea (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons, page commons:Category:Pipilo_fuscus Jheald (talk) 09:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The low quality picture is of the back of the Canyon Towhee. The ones on Commons are far superior and I don't think this one is particularly helpful. — ξ^xplicit 00:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Growth vs article count to dec 2003.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by The Anome (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: moved to Commons: I am not sure that FoP is relevant here. The structure in the background looks to be colonial and is only background. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombo-street.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Colombo -- Jheald (talk) 10:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Sri Lanka does not have freedom of panorama. — ξ^xplicit 00:51, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombo-colonial.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Colombo -- Jheald (talk) 10:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Apparently Sri Lanka does not have freedom of panorama. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombo-near-station.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Colombo -- Jheald (talk) 10:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Apparently Sri Lanka does not have freedom of panorama. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombo-street2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Colombo -- Jheald (talk) 10:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Apparently Sri Lanka does not have freedom of panorama. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Blurpeace (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-apartments.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:05, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Blurpeace (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-bridge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Blurpeace (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-centre-colonial.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-centre-statue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Blurpeace (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-centre-street2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Blurpeace (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-centre-street3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Blurpeace (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-centre-street4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Juliancolton (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-centre-street5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-centre-street.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for same reasons as mentioned. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mumbai-centre-street-market.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joedjemal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:41, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The Mumbai article lacks pictures of the slum areas- only one picture of "slums", despite the article claiming the city suffers from "widespread poverty". It also claims that "About 60% of Mumbai's population lives in slums." The only picture in the article is a picture of the largest slum, so there is something to be said about including a more common sight. The picture says it is from VT station, so perhaps it could also be included in Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, which paints a shockingly different picture of the area. It is admittedly low quality, so I may change my vote if somebody points out a similar picture. -Frazzydee|✍ 01:54, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I'm not sure if this is considered a slum per se, but nevertheless it is a picture that displays the poverty problems faced by the city. The current article has little juxtaposition between the more touristy areas/business district vs. smaller impoverished markets, which are apparently not located very far from some of the beautiful buildings depicted. -Frazzydee|✍ 02:01, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to Commons commons:Category:Mumbai or subcats -- Jheald (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hakone-fuji-jpatokal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jpatokal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:46, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Consider move to Commons? Page commons:Mt._Fuji -- Jheald (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms oregon washington territory 1859 b.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:47, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 10:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms washington territory 1863.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 10:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms idaho territory 1863.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 10:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms idaho territory 1864.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms idaho territory 1864 legend.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms new mexico territory 1861 legend idx.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 10:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms terra thenarrows.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted/redundant low-res version, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Commons has high res version at File:Aster_newyorkcity_lrg.jpg (3.3 Mb). Probably not worth copying this there as a low-res alternative? Jheald (talk) 10:25, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms terra newarkbay.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted/redundant low-res version, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:View of Jerusalem (small).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Alex S (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons. It's a really nice pic, and as far as I can see doesn't duplicate anything we already have there. commons:Category:Views_from_the_Mount_of_Olives Also worth adding to page commons:Jerulalem. File:JerusalemFromMountOfOlives.JPG is similar, but IMO the light effect makes this pic much more striking. Jheald (talk) 10:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms ev26188 aquidneckisland.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted/redundant low-res version, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms ev26188 conanicutisland.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted/redundant low-res version, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wpdms ev26188 narragansettbay.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted/redundant low-res version, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unknown bird belize.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Belizian (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crapemyrtle 8047.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pollinator (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, Low Quality, blurry, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 07:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to Commons. commons:Category:Tillandsia usneoides (Spanish moss); commons:Category:Lagerstroemia (Crape myrtle). Doesn't seem particularly blurry to me; I really like it as a picture of the Spanish moss. Jheald (talk) 11:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MDC5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Gdmard (notify | contribs | uploads).

• publicity photo, need OTRS confirmation that uploader has authority to freely license Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:49, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Drunkfish.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Anetode (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image, current revision created 2 March 2007, ie over 3 years ago -m-i-k-e-y-^{Talk / C} 12:05, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chinese Division Table.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Happypal (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Obsolete by wikitext on Suanpan Chrismiceli (talk) 14:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Полевые цветы Швейцарии.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rian-ma (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphan. Duplicate of File:Wild_Flowers_of_Switzerland_by_Mary_Bothwell.jpg Haruth (talk) 15:31, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, identical md5's indicate an exact duplicate file. File name is in a foreign language and should be deleted in favour of identical copy with english filename. -Frazzydee|✍ 19:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MostExpensive10.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Chad1m (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image from deleted article. Sottolacqua (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as per OP's rationale. -Frazzydee|✍ 19:17, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mostexpensiveseason36.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kyle C Haight (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image from deleted article. Sottolacqua (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as per OP's rationale. -Frazzydee|✍ 19:17, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Professorprice.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wikider (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned image from deleted article. Sottolacqua (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by Howcheng (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montistralia Map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ztucker07 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphan & unencyclopedic. Image was originally uploaded as a map for a fictional country. Pertaining article speedied at Montistralia, restored as a user sub-page upon request. User then moved it to People's Democratic Republic of Montistralia where it was speedied again. Wikipedia it not a personal webspace provider or a file storage area. Frazzydee|✍ 18:43, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I should add, the pertaining article was a fictional country created for a "Developing Nations course at the University of Arkansas at Monticello". -Frazzydee|✍ 19:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by Howcheng (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picresized th 1270709471 Montistralia Flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ztucker07 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Same rationale as File:Montistralia_Map.jpg Frazzydee|✍ 18:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Henry Ware Personality of the Deity 1.djvu (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Frank.trampe (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unclear what encyclopedic purpose this file serves; only used in userspace. At best a candidate for upload to Wikisource. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:VdaggersVforVendetta.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by P-Chan (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unjustifiable FU image. In the battle with Creedy and his men at Victoria station, he uses five of his six daggers and forms a "V" with his daggers just before he throws them. adequately conveys the same information as this image. ÷seresin 22:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The image is being used to exemplify the "V" imagery that appears throughout the film, as the article discusses. By showing the frame, the reader can see visually how the imagery was presented assess for themselves how blatant or subtle was the presence of the motif. Jheald (talk) 13:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I understand what the image does. However, lack of this image would not significantly impair any reader's understanding of that which it depicts—that he held the daggers in such a way that they formed a V. Ergo, the image is unjustified. ÷seresin 02:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not a particularly useful image. howcheng {chat} 03:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BacksinCanada.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tzar (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Double non-free action: Non-free photo of non-free 3D artwork, which is not even discussed in the article. howcheng {chat} 23:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• It's a striking image, and certainly adds to reader understanding of the artist's work. Taken with the other two images, it gives a sense of the diversity of her work, albeit thematically linked. From the description in the article, "a series of eighty slightly differing sculptures of the human trunk", I doubt this is what I would have pictured; nor would I have imagined the how it relates with her other work. Keep. Jheald (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Obviously we are never going to have a completely free photo (see Commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#Korea (South)), but we can't possibly use someone else's photo of the artwork unless that photo itself is the subject of discussion. Even in England, which has FOP for permanently installed 3D artwork, I can't use some random person's photo of Angel of the North (for example) because the photo itself is non-free. That's the situation here. If an enterprising Korean contributor can go take a photo of the artwork and release that photo under a free license (i.e., it would have two licenses: one for the photographic aspect, and one for the artwork), that would be perfectly acceptable. howcheng {chat} 22:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.