Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 September 25

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; now tagged as fair use. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 23:20, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HansvDohnanyi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kelisi (notify | contribs).

• {{PD-Germany}} - "photographic works are copyrighted for 70 years after the death of the photographer." Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, rather than do something utterly destructive like deleting a photo of this man, had you considered instead stating a fair-use rationale? I don't think any other pictures of Hans von Dohnanyi even exist. Be creative, not destructive.Kelisi (talk) 01:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I have no problem with a fair use rationale; I had meant to list this file at Possibly unfree files to determine the copyright status. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LMB00013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Luis María Benítez (notify | contribs).

• Photographs of a back covers and backs. Covers does not look simple enough to be considered PD Skier Dude (talk) 01:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Including the following images:

• File:LMB00014.jpg
• File:LMB00037.jpg
• File:LMB00032.jpg
• File:LMB00038.jpg
• File:LMB00035.jpg
• File:LMB00034.jpg
• File:LMB00036.jpg
• File:LMB00041.jpg
• File:LMB00042.jpg
• File:LMB00039.jpg
• File:LMB00005.jpg
• File:LMB00007.jpg
• File:LMB00008.jpg
• File:LMB00012.jpg
• File:LMB00011.jpg
• File:LMB00010.jpg
• File:LMB00009.jpg
• File:LMB00030.jpg
• File:LMB00043.jpg
• File:LMB00026.jpg
• File:LMB00015.jpg
• File:LMB00016.jpg
• File:LMB00017.jpg
• File:LMB00027.jpg
• File:LMB00018.jpg
• File:LMB00019.jpg
• File:LMB00020.jpg
• File:LMB00021.jpg
• File:LMB00022.jpg
• File:LMB00023.jpg
• File:LMB00024.jpg
• File:LMB00025.jpg
• File:LMB00029.jpg
• File:LMB00028.jpg

• Photographs of a back covers and backs (and inserts). Covers does not look simple enough to be considered PD Skier Dude (talk) 01:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, no proof that any of these have been released into PD by their actual owners. Skier Dude (talk) 01:32, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TAREDC.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gonzalochileno (notify | contribs).

• Possibly a duplicate of File:The Amazing Race en Discovery Channel Map.PNG. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 01:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete TAREDC.PNG, because there is another one. thank you so much :)... HEY! how i'm going to update the legs, because in File:The Amazing Race en Discovery Channel Map.PNG i can't upload a new version of the image, what can i do? Gonzalochileno (talk) 03:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: you can update the legs on your TAR franchise in Wikimedia Commons, sign up your account first before you enter the site. Thanks. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 21:53, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then, just delete this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TAREDC.PNG ..... thanks!!! Gonzalochileno (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hinshenq.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Milou ge (notify | contribs).

• sourcing is too poor to establish proper license Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NYJ Mark Sanchez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by User:Mr. Unknown (notify | contribs).

• Not linked to any page. Mr. Unknown (talk) 04:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chinese Division Table.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nanami Kamimura (notify | contribs).

• Obsolete, universally replaced by Chinese Division Table.png Papa November (talk) 08:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eviction-table.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Coreix (notify | contribs).

• Obsolete, replaced by wikitable Papa November (talk) 09:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flooding percentage table.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Geography scholar (notify | contribs).

• Obsolete, replaced by table Papa November (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medusa & Live In Central Park 1995 2CD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MattRus (notify | contribs).

• In the context of a similar non-free image, this doesn't add much. PhilKnight (talk) 09:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toto Coelo - I Eat Cannibals - Part 1 excerpt.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ian_Dunster (notify | contribs).

• This "excerpt" is almost twice the recommended size for music samples Rockfang (talk) 09:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:100 4240.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bengt23648 (notify | contribs).

• Unencylopedia, Orphan. Plenty of other, better pictures of this breed of dog. ↔NMajdan•talk 13:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: The file was moved from File:100 4240.jpg to File:Puggle.jpg by TheDJ (talk · contribs) at 11:49, 1 October 2009. Anomie⚔ 13:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icon gnu automake image 1.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by The8thbit (notify | contribs).

• Orphan, small version of File:Heckert GNU white.svg. OsamaK 13:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Isekkiln n tifinagh.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Huhsunqu (notify | contribs).

• small, orphan, old, replaced-by-SVG image. OsamaK 15:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Owif-bioyh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bwmoll3 (notify | contribs).

• The article already has the cassette single cover. We don't need the 45 too. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yasar-kemal s.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ozgurgerilla (notify | contribs).

• Copyright violation. At OTRS ticket 2009092510042303, we have received a e-mail stating very credibly: "The photo on the Wikipedia site on turkish author Yasar Kamel has been put there by user "ozgurgerilla" without my permission. I am the sole copyright holder of the photo that has been published rightfully and with the required mentioning of the copyright holder by several publishing houses in Germany and other countries. Please take the necessary steps to resolve that issue."  Sandstein  16:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yilmazguney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ozgurgerilla (notify | contribs).

• Very likely a copyright violation and mistagged as own work. In view of the copyright owner's complaint we received via OTRS regarding File:Yasar-kemal s.jpg (see discussion above), also uploaded by this user, it appears very likely that this image was similarly just found somewhere on the Internet. The user is inactive since 2007.  Sandstein  16:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:50-ken-loach.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ozgurgerilla (notify | contribs).

• Very likely a copyright violation and mistagged as own work. In view of the copyright owner's complaint we received via OTRS regarding File:Yasar-kemal s.jpg (see discussion above), also uploaded by this user, it appears very likely that this image was similarly just found somewhere on the Internet. The user is inactive since 2007.  Sandstein  16:57, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cousin Eddie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jklin (notify | contribs).

• Fails WP:NFCC #8. Just identifies a character the actor plays. The article is about the actor not the character. Nv8200p talk 17:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Counterpoint: I didn't recognize Randy Quaid from other pictures but was able to identify him and recall his acting history by viewing this picture

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JaridianFleet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LiamKincaid (notify | contribs).

• I don't think the Fair Use Rationale on this one is strong enough. Its purpose is to illustrate the Jaridian fleet, but very little critical commentary is given in the article, and the image conveys nothing that words can't do just as well. The Wordsmith_{(formerly known as Firestorm)}^Communicate 17:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:StacyLondon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gbern3 (notify | contribs).

• Fair use image used in the infobox. As this is a living person, the image can be replaced with a free image instead (WP:NFCC#1). —SpaceFlight89 19:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Your statement makes this sound easy. #1 states "Where possible, non-free content is... replaced with a freer alternative if one of acceptable quality is available." Available being the key word. There is no free image. The ones I've seen on Google images are copyrighted. Already checked Flickr—the photos there don't have a license I can use on the commons thus, not free. Why so adamant for deletion? I just uploaded this image two hours ago. It's only being used in one article and I've provided a fair use rationale. Other than the fact that a photo is good to have in a biographical article anyway I liked this one in particular because it clearly shows the natural gray streak she has in the front of her hair. This is applicable to her Pantene endorsement because there's a clause in her contract that allows her to keep it. This clause is mentioned in the personal life section of article and because of that this image definitely meets non-free content policy #8 of contextual significance. I should add this to the file's summary. Doing it now... // Gbern3 (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unless this person is a hermit, someone could make a freer one by taking a picture of her.--Rockfang (talk) 20:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Here is a freer file.--Rockfang (talk) 20:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - That was really nice of you to find a free photo. I really don't think other editors would have bothered to look. Changing the photo now... // Gbern3 (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1970s decade portrait2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ZenCopain (notify | contribs).

• Image includes derivatives of fair use images. Admrboltz (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as copyvio. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1940s decade portrait2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ZenCopain (notify | contribs).

• includes derivative works of fair use imagery. Admrboltz (talk) 20:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as copyvio. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1960s decade portrait2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ZenCopain (notify | contribs).

• includes derivative works of fair use imagery. Admrboltz (talk) 20:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as copyvio. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1950s decade portrait2.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ZenCopain (notify | contribs).

• includes derivative works of fair use imagery. Admrboltz (talk) 20:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as copyvio. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Obama globe 12jan2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ChrisO (notify | contribs).

• The article Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories has no requisite reliably sourced critical commentary on this (nor any) supermarket tabloid covers. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 22:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC) — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 22:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.