Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 May 1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penguin.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pomergirl (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It does not illustrate anything, so not useful in an encyclopedia.Steve Dufour (talk) 02:52, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pennywiseclown2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pumapayam (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 23:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm sad to say it, but it is indeed a copyright violation. Pennywise is part of a copyrighted work and any depiction used in a userbox would be a violation. - Mgm|^(talk) 07:52, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pepband.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lbostenero (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 23:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Additionally, the image is almost a year old and the uploader didn't try to add it to any pages. - Mgm|^(talk) 07:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peopleonhorses.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Laptopgeneration (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 00:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. TheAE talk/sign 20:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perf2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Priteshda21 (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:21, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Not apart of an encyclopedia. TheAE talk/sign 20:22, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perix_mental_1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Prostatsoikogeneias (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, not a real book. TheAE talk/sign 20:23, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perryport.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PAHouseGOP (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, possible Copyright violation Nv8200p talk 00:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• keep No copyright problem since uploader said he took the photo. An article might be written about this person. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• The uploader had numerous copyright issues with text and images he uploaded. I doubt the uploader created this image as claimed. More likely, the image is the work of the Pennsylvania state government, which makes use of the image a copyright violation. -Nv8200p talk 14:08, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Personal_Image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cbbernier (notify | contribs).

• Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Nv8200p talk 00:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not needed on WP since it is unlikely that an article will be written on this person, as nice as he seems to be. Steve Dufour (talk) 02:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete In addition, it's also unlikely to be used on a userpage. The image is more than a year old and the user in question did nothing besides uploading the image. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:00, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCN0533.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fakeplastic_brett (notify | contribs).

• orphan band photo, no telling who they are, licensing is also suspect – Quadell ^(talk) 01:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not only is it impossible to identify the people in the photo, the uploader also clearly misunderstood the licenses he tagged it with. The summary says: "Image taken and owned by Sam Brett, if you wish to copy this image please contact the owner." The GFDL and the CC license used have no such requirement. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SAWebsite.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rboy518 (notify | contribs).

• Unnecessary non-free image. MBisanz ^talk 02:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Screen shot of school's website in not useful to justify using copyrighted picture.Steve Dufour (talk) 02:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The image provides no additional value for the article. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lukket-50s-computer-HOAX.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alkivar (notify | contribs).

• Hoax photo, non-free, used as one of many examples in an article without direct commentary, NFCC#8 violation – Quadell ^(talk) 02:36, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Because copyrighted. Article can link to creator's site if he posts it. Steve Dufour (talk) 10:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PFTranslationUK8pages.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 1027E (notify | contribs).

• No non-free rationale given and none possible: pdf file contains multiple non-free images; use would not increase readers understanding. —teb728 t c 07:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Contains copyrighted material. Bad load times on the original website are a reason to fix your browser or the website in question, not a reason to host material you don't own elsewhere. (P.S. This appears to be the translation, so additional reason here is that translations of copyrighted material are still copyrighted to the original publication's owner.) - Mgm|^(talk) 08:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above two nominations. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PFMagazineNL8pages.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 1027E (notify | contribs).

• No non-free rationale given and none possible: pdf file contains multiple non-free images; use would not increase readers understanding. —teb728 t c 07:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Contains copyrighted material. Bad load times on the original website are a reason to fix your browser or the website in question, not a reason to host material you don't own elsewhere. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above two nominations. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mellowdronetiny.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mrtheedge (notify | contribs).

• Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. This appears to be a portion of the logo for Mellowdrone, which may mean that this is a copyright violation. —Bkell (talk) 16:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It is the logo for Mellowdrone if Google Image search is to be believed. It's impossible to release someone else's logo into the public domain and there's no viable reason to fix the license since there is no real use for a tiny version of such a logo. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Any larger upload of such an image needs to be used and labeled appropriately ({{PD-ineligible}}), but there is no encyclopedic use for this one. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NO Radiators full band.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xtifr (notify | contribs).

• Unused, no context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 16:57, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. I support keeping this if there is a use for it and OTRS verification is provided. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:26, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCN1428.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ca90069 (notify | contribs).

• orphan, bad name, low quality – Quadell ^(talk) 18:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete File:The Birds 026.jpg is a better quality image and can potentially illustrate more articles. (also has better caption) - Mgm|^(talk) 08:15, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per both of the above noms. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blood Oath album.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FireCrystal (notify | contribs).

• An updated version of this album cover has been uploaded (File:Suffocation - Blood Oath album cover.jpg). The old version was revealed on Apr. 16, 2009, the final version on Apr. 23, 2009. Have a nice day.  LYKANTROP  ✉ 20:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The resolution of the new cover is too high. Before the old one gets axed, the new one needs to be scaled down. Also, make sure the change is actually mentioned in the prose, so the image isn't actually needed. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete/fix new image per MGM. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leeroy Jenkins Jeopardy clue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by OntarioQuizzer (notify | contribs).

• Copyrighted text, can't qualify for fairuse. MBisanz ^talk 23:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per MBisanz And what encyclopedic value does this file have? Thanks, mynameinc 23:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Perhaps a case can be made for the text to be used in an article, but the image is wholly unneccessary. (P.S. I don't think it's a copyright violation since there was no creativity involved in how the image came to be. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The text is indeed copyrighted and its phrasing for the question answer in Jeopardy! is certainly copyrightable. That said, the actual question can be referenced in the article without using a screenshot and its existence is wholly unnecessary. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Levelchecksig.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stevertigo (notify | contribs).

• Signature of an indef blocked user. MBisanz ^talk 23:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "No images in signatures". I think the rules on that are pretty clear. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per both above. TheAE talk/sign 20:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete TheAE said it... — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.