Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Upper Wentworth Falls, NSW, Australia - Nov 2008.jpg

File:Upper Wentworth Falls, NSW, Australia - Nov 2008.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2011 at 23:35:48 (UTC)

Reason: I'm proposing a delist and replace. At the time I took a panorama with a wider view but couldn't get it to stitch right. Well, I gave it another go recently and had more success. It's not perfect, and there are some aspects to the older image that I prefer, but I think the proposed replacement has better EV as it shows the waterfall more completely. There is some distortion at the top and and edges, and the sky isn't quite as vibrant due to the blending used, for example. It also appears a bit crooked but with the angle of view, it's not possible to correct completely IMO.
Articles this image appears in: Wentworth Falls (waterfall)
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Upper Wentworth Falls
Nominator: Ðiliff «» (Talk)

Delist and replace — Ðiliff «» (Talk) 23:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace, per nom. Composition is superior without a doubt. Jujutacular ^talk 00:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace - I'm not sure I'd say the composition was superior artistically, but it's CERTAINLY more encyclopedic to see the whole thing. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 01:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
D&R Nergaal (talk) 16:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
D&R Jeez Dave, you were hiding 60% of the vista from us. :) upstate NYer 20:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There's still more [1]. Spencer^T♦C 22:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist ~~and replace~~ Spencer^T♦C 22:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure we necessarily need to replace this...we already have an FPC of the exact same waterfall, but just a different view. I'm really not seeing enough uniqueness between both images for their to be room for both. Spencer^T♦C 22:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - With all respect, I don't think a delist vote is compatible with this proposal. Suppose that this ends with just enough 'delist' votes but not quite enough 'replace' votes as a result of your extra delist vote. Should the image simply be delisted? No - I would argue that the other voters did so with the intent of the nomination in mind. If you feel strongly that there should be only one featured image, then you should probably start delist nomination with that explicit intent. Ðiliff «» (Talk) 18:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While I agree that the wider shot has more EV, it does have some blown highlights and might be a little desaturated. If these things can be corrected I'm happy to change my vote. Spencer does have a good point regarding the second FP of the same waterfall. IMO that one should probably be delisted. But thats another story...Ottojula ^(talk) 23:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with File:Upper Wentworth Falls 3, NSW, Australia - Nov 2008.jpg --Makeemlighter (talk) 00:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]