Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 25

< February 24
February 26 >

February 25

Category:American male child actors by ethnic or national origin

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one category in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 23:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Female mass murderers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Fails WP:OCEGRS with no such real-life category or indication this is a notable intersection. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Should be also merged to Fictional female murderers Mason (talk) 20:46, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There is "no such real-life category" about this? That's a factually incorrect claim, see Category:Female mass murderers. AHI-3000 (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, let me rephrase that - there WAS no such category until it was created by you and it's disingenuous to imply it existed previously. I will also be nominating that category for merging as there is no clear evidence WP:OCEGRS is passed by either of them. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Still oppose. See Category:Female assassins, Category:Female serial killers, and other subcategories of Category:Female murderers. As long as there's female subcategories for assassins and serial killers, then why not mass murderers or spree killers too? AHI-3000 (talk) 21:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Female serial killers is very clearly not a WP:OCEGRS violation, as there are many reliable sources about the phenomenon. Category:Female assassins was created by you, so it's not a valid thing to point to as a counterpoint of "pre-existing" categories. If you can prove that it is a notable intersection I'm fine with withdrawing the nomination, but you would have to demonstrate that is a phenomenon separate from simply being female and a murderer. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree, Category:Female serial killers is not very clearly a non-violation of WP:OCEGRS any more or any less than Category:Female mass murderers. Sincerely, Thinker78 (talk) 22:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Discussed intersection of crime and gender, should be kept.
  • A Female Mass Murder
  • Women Serial and Mass Murderers: A Worldwide Reference, 1580 Through 1990
  • An Exploration of Female Mass Shooters
Notable for being rare it seems. Also the relevant serial killer category exists, and if you look closely a lot of works titled around female serial killers also discuss female mass killers (sometimes people just call them as one thing) PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. Mason (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dimadick: What do you think about this? AHI-3000 (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AHI-3000 this strikes me as blatant canvassing. Qwerfjkltalk 14:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Notable intersection as pointed by Namiba's sources. Dimadick (talk) 06:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge they should already be subcatted by nationality, not convinced WP:OCEGRS doesn't apply. SportingFlyer T·C 21:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Does it apply any less than with the serial killers? Crime and gender is a very discussed intersection. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People with type 1 diabetes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 4#Category:People with type 1 diabetes

Category:Private Space Missions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: match wikipedia:category names#Categories for articles Arlo James Barnes 19:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
agree Vegan416 (talk) 13:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Sports venues in India

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated with no prejudice against recreation if the category can be appropriately populated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not every populated place needs a sports venues category. Extremely narrow cases set to upmerge here. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom, without objection to recreate any of these categories when some more articles are available. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Speeches by year

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge * Pppery * it has begun... 19:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
more siblings until 1899 nominated
Nominator's rationale: merge, almost every of these categories only contains one or two articles, which is not very helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Not useful for navigation. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Merge per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It seems to be a way to fill the "works" categories with politically-connected works. Dimadick (talk) 17:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • A speech is a creative work, for whatever purpose. Many articles are about political speeches, granted, but not all, and why would it matter? Marcocapelle (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom and Marco's reply directly above. I don't see why fill[ing] the "works" categories with politically-connected works is A Bad Thing. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 21:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Canadian indigenous academics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overlapping category Mason (talk) 16:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Syro-Malabar Catholic Church

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Main article was moved to this name after discussion, so it seems we should follow suit with the category. ~ Pbritti (talk) 16:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename, this could have been listed at speedy. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Marcocapelle: Ah! I had a sense that I was approaching this too bureaucratically. Should I still list this at speedy, and where is that? Thanks, ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Pbritti: it's okay for now, my comment was just that you know it for next time. You can click on "speedy" in my previous edit. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Softball teams in the United States by populated place

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Softball teams in the United States by populated place (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Softball teams in the United States
  • Propose deleting Category:Softball teams by country and city (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Narrow intersection. Not useful for category navigation. Contains only the Washington, D.C. category. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:53, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
support nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Merge: Not a useful layer for navigation. Let'srun (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Chess grandmasters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To be consistent with the capitalization of the rest of the FIDE titles categories listed in Category:Chess titles, similarly to Category:Chess woman grandmasters nomination. Konstantina07 (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom. Let'srun (talk) 18:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rename. Also rename Category:Chess women grandmasters which was inexplicably closed without any consensus or action being taken. These are uncontroversial changes. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 11:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sport in Mauritius by locality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Sport in Port Louis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Port Louis
  • Propose merging Category:Sport in Vacoas-Phoenix (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) to Category:Vacoas-Phoenix
  • Propose deleting Category:History of Port Louis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Propose deleting Category:Centuries in Port Louis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Propose deleting Category:21st century in Port Louis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Propose deleting Category:Sport in Mauritius by locality (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Narrow intersection impeding category navigation. Merge/delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Meitei inscriptions

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Indian inscriptions. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Meitei inscriptions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Category of one item. PepperBeast (talk) 15:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ottoman-Azerbaijani wars

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 4#Category:Ottoman-Azerbaijani wars


Category:Pakistan presidential speeches

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, only one article in this category, is not helpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Video game gameplay

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There seems to be a large WP:OVERLAPCAT in this case. It's possible the articles here need to be merged into game design or the subcategory Category:Video game terminology. Category:Gameplay doesn't exist either, making this category sort of stand alone. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose They're two distinct categories and less overlap than I thought there would be. One deals with gameplay elements, the other more with how to design elements. SportingFlyer T·C 19:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but purge gameplay. Things like Category:Cheating in video games‎ and speedrunning are gameplay, but Category:Video games with AI-versus-AI modes‎ are about design. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 10:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose I fail to see how gameplay is an element of design. Dimadick (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but purge per HouseBlaster. There are many pages that do not belong. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2019 crimes in New Mexico

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one page in here, and it's a redirect, which isn't helpful for navigation. Redirect is already in February 2019 crimes in the United States, so no need to 3x merge Mason (talk) 04:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dual merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dual merge It is not the size that is troubling here. We do not have annual categories for crime events in each of the U.S. States, and most crimes just get inserted in the "year x in state x" categories. Several of these categories are already underpopulated and don't need subcategories of their own. Dimadick (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Auschwitz boxers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 5#Category:Auschwitz boxers

Category:20th-century Danish medallists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all as nominated. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one artist in each category, which isn't helpful for navigation. Also, the only page in the 16th-century is about a German medalist Anton Meybusch active in Copenhagen. Mason (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. I would leave Anton Meybusch in the Danish tree. It is difficult to determine nationality other than based on place where people live and that applies even more to older centuries. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's fair. I've now added the relevant categories to Anton, so they'll be in both german and danish cats. Mason (talk) 14:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Merge per nom. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I have added some more articles to the 20th-century and 21st-century categories and a few more are on their way. No need for the 16-century category for now.Ramblersen2 (talk) 18:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Please populate categories at the same time you make them. Mason (talk) 18:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Smasongarrison, I'd still say merge. I don't see any other "Foo medalist by century" category besides the Danish one. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As of relisting, Category:20th-century Danish medallists has seven members, Category:21st-century Danish medallists has three members, and Category:16th-century Danish medallists has one. (There appears to be rough consensus to delete 16th century category; relisting for input on the others.)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge all per nom. There's no reason to diffuse YYth-century medallists by nationality nor diffuse Danish medallists by century. They are small trees. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suppose, if merged, there should be a third merge target, namely xxth-century Danish artists. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Albums arranged by Tony Glover

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. No evidence has been provided that this is a defining characteristic. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Albums arranged by Tony Glover (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Propose deleting Category:Albums arranged by John Koerner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • Propose deleting Category:Albums arranged by Dave Ray (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Redundant to the albums by producer categories Category:Albums arranged by John Koerner, Category:Albums produced by John Koerner, and Category:Albums produced by Dave Ray. Arrangers of non-big band or jazz albums, particulary post-1950s, is non-defining. Often times the arrangers are only mentioned in the personnel sections and no more defining than who played guitar or harmonica on such albums. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:43, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep is there any consensus to delete these by genre? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not about genre as much as it's about WP:DEFINING. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 06:56, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any consensus that they are less defining by genre? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Right now, all I am saying is that it is not defining for Blues, Rags and Hollers. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, while reading the article it does not appear as a defining characteristic, it is not in the infobox either. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Loyola Greyhounds football seasons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:30, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one page in category. Let'srun (talk) 19:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep; part of well-defined, highly-structured categorization scheme. Jweiss11 (talk) 05:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Merging this will not help navigation at all - it will only make it more difficult to navigate articles, something that goes against the purpose of the entire reason we have categories. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not true, after merging it will become easier to navigate to e.g. Category:Loyola Greyhounds football players because you no longer have to scroll a level up. (Added after relisting.) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • As I explained here, it might make it one click easier for those who only want to find those, but then you might as well suggest merging every college football category in existence so as to stop the extremely laborious act of making one click. Sarcasm aside, it is more beneficial as I explained in the aforementioned link to keep them separate; when looking for college football team categories by seasons, the most likely way one would try to find this, this would no longer appear, giving the appearance that they don't exist...something not helpful... BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Can always be re-created if additional seasons are created. SportingFlyer T·C 19:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. It's unhelpful to have this category. Mason (talk) 01:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional transhumans

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 4#Category:Fictional transhumans

Category:Martyrs from Kavajë

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The two people in this category are described as activists. If not merged, it should be renamed to Activists from Kavajë Mason (talk) 01:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cabinet ministers from Kavajë

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection between city and government position. We don't have any other diplomat/minister categories that are diffused Mason (talk) 01:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. Overly-specific categories. Dimadick (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Military figures from Kavajë

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: More sensible name. Mason (talk) 01:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per WP:C2C. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename per nom. "Figures" is a strange term to use here. Dimadick (talk) 18:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sculptors from Kavajë

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge all of them as nominated, except for Category:Music critics from Kavajë which is only being merged with Category:Albanian critics. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. Only one person in each of these categories Mason (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom, without objection to recreate any of these categories when some more articles are available. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support nearly all of them. Except pilots (a category that could cover civilian personnel) and critics (that they write music reviews does not translate to being musicians. Dimadick (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • The only article in the pilots category, Haki Abaz Skuqi, is about a military pilot, so that is not an issue. The comment about critics is more to the point. Article Spiro Kalemi is already in the writers category so Category:Music critics from Kavajë only needs to be merged to Category:Albanian critics. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Historical figures from Kavajë

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. (also Category:Institution heads; Category:Historical figures don't exist.) Mason (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Advocates of women's reproductive rights

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 March 5#Category:Advocates of women's reproductive rights

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_25&oldid=1214238975"