Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 March 22

March 22

Category:Songs about sexuality

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 14#Category:Songs about sexuality

Category:18th-century Roman Catholic bishops in Britain

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Category:18th-century Roman Catholic bishops in Britain

Category:Indian priests

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This mixes up priests from different religions and denominations. These articles should be dispersed. Rathfelder (talk) 15:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seem? Hmm. Perhaps disperse to Category:Brahmins. Laurel Lodged (talk) 18:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wife's Hemant Soren

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete (WP:NOTBURO) (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 04:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Wife's Hemant Soren (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Unclear what this is meant to be. This person appears to only have one wife. Star Mississippi 13:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This category has been emptied. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    yes, his wife was a clear A7. @Zeke, the Mad Horrorist I have no issue with your speedy. I am entirely unfamiliar with categories and wasn't sure how to proceed so I brought it here. Star Mississippi 00:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    And I don't use speedy too often myself; I hesitated when I realized the notice deploys with a message saying the category is not currently up for discussion at CfD, which this one is (otherwise, implicitly, it can't be speedied). I felt I would be called out for being a bit overzealous in using it, and since this isn't really a pressing matter anyway (this thing's going bye bye no matter what), it doesn't matter either way to me. I'm fine with speedy delete if everyone else is. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 00:27, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Same. And equally happy to get this off the logs if it helps. Star Mississippi 00:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete even if it becomes filled with anything. We don't categorize for spouses, former or current, on biographies. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 22:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cuphead

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 03:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Cuphead (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: This category only covers two unique pages in mainspace. In time there may be more distinctly notable articles about Cuphead as a potential series or franchise, but the category's existence at the moment runs contrary to the advice provided by WP:TOOSOON. It serves no purpose other then as an expression of enthusiasm by a fan. Haleth (talk) 04:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_22&oldid=1089405809"