Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 February 4

February 4

Category:Nature sanctuaries

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: disperse and delete (this is a case of WP:SHAREDNAME). – Fayenatic London 09:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: redirect to Category:Nature reserves and disperse the content of the category among the tree of Category:Nature reserves. The only thing that distinguishes the content of this category from Category:Nature reserves is the word sanctuary. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Imams (worship leaders)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 20:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I can see no reason for keeping these separate categories. – Fayenatic London 22:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Sanctuaries

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 16:26, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: turn into a disambiguation page, the three subcategories have nothing in common with each other except for the word sanctuary. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- Sanctuary means a holy place. By extension it was a place of refuge from persecution, either of asylum or where justice could be done properly. We have a mixture of Greek temples, places of asylum, and some Peruvian sites whose status as sanctuaries is not clear. The nom is also suggesting that nature sanctuaries should be merged into nature reserves (which I support) and I assume will be implemented. I wonder whether we need a split between Category:Sanctuaries (religious sites) and Category:Sanctuaries (refuges). Peterkingiron (talk) 15:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • We may create new subcategories, but that is unrelated to this proposal. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Soy Luna characters

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. MER-C 20:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: One article, upmerge to all three categories. TTN (talk) 11:46, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @TTN: the second parent category is a container category (no articles), please check. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Livestock guardians

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: split to Category:Livestock guardian dogs. Note: I will implement this by a rename and then re-create the parent. – Fayenatic London 09:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Current livestock guardians category is largely focused on livestock guardian dogs and a number of non-dog livestock guardian animals are not included in it and under the broader Category:Working animals category. Creating a new category for livestock guardian dogs within the broader livestock guardians would make it more clear that these other species should be included in the broader category. Wcconey (First time submitting a cfd request, so might have messed up in specific type of request (containerization versus splitting?).) 11:19, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Comment - present category is clearly intended for dogs, as it is a subcat of Category:Dogs and per its criteria. However I see that Mule is included. Easiest is to create Category:Livestock guardian dogs, move dogs into it and leave non-canines out of it. Oculi (talk) 12:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- It also has goose and llama. Those articles would have to be moved to Category:Non-canine livestock guardians. Despite the incongruity, I see no great harm in leaving it as it is. Life is complicated and it is not always possible to fit things into precise categories. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt1 per Oculi. We normally create categories for what the items in the category are, not for what they are not (as in non-canine). Marcocapelle (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Oculi’s proposal, move all of the dog breeds into a new category. Cavalryman (talk) 20:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]
  • Support Oculi rationale. William Harristalk 11:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shopping malls in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Perhaps the suggested category could be added as a parent to the current category. – Fayenatic London 09:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not all of these are in Harrisburg proper. Colonial Park Mall is in Lower Paxton Township, and Lebanon Valley Mall is in Lebanon. There are also malls in other cities in this MSA that either have articles (York Galleria, North Hanover Mall) or potential for articles. I have found some potential sources to cover a defunct mall in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and I know of several other malls in this MSA that could potentially have articles. Extending this category to cover the entire MSA would allow for a greater reach. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, for consistency, we normally categorize by city or by first-level country subdivision. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hungarian conspiracy theorists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: has already been deleted (non-admin closure). Marcocapelle (talk) 20:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Hungarian conspiracy theorists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: This category was created by mistake. -- Sangjinhwa (talk) 00:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can blank the page, type {{Db-self}} and save. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_February_4&oldid=947440072"