Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 November 1

November 1

Category:CT table-related templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 07:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:CT table-related templates (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Unused (had only two members; now in Category:Table and column templates). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:31, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Templates up for deletion anyway as duplicates. The two were never distinct enough to merit a category. SFB 09:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from Bø i Telemark

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as duplicate. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:People from Bø i Telemark (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Bø i Telemark redirects to Bø, Telemark, and Category:People from Bø, Telemark already exists. The only content is a subcategory Category:Musicians from Bø i Telemark I'm proposing be merged (see below). Tassedethe (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as duplicate category. SFB 09:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Musicians from Bø i Telemark

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Upmerge. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge. The municipality Bø, Telemark has a population of ~5000. The category Category:People from Bø, Telemark doesn't need to be further sub-categorized by occupation. Tassedethe (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support upmerge This is a small subcategory that is better grouped as "People from Bø, Telemark" and Category:Musicians from Telemark‎ (a county, of which Norway has 19). SFB 09:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Games all-rounders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Note: the list is also nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of all-rounders in games of skill. – Fayenatic London 01:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose deleting Category:Games all-rounders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Inclusion criteria is totally subjective. What games, what sports, what events, what level of expertise? A list already exists at List of all-rounders in games of skill and seems limited to 5 games. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The term is not a notable one. Google results throw up perhaps two relevant, original references from the Mind Sports Olympiad, which itself does not use the term frequently. Article should probably go too as original research/topic. SFB 09:35, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete purely subjective. However, if someone wanted to call this Category:Awesome game players, no doubt we'd have kept it. </sarcasm> Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:33, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Parallel universe (fiction) video games

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Fell free to nominate the parent and article for additional discussion as to what the best name is. If needed, this can be renamed in the future based on additional discussions. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose renaming Category:Parallel universe (fiction) video games to Category:Parallel universe video games
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Redundant moot disambiguation, the context of video games already shows what's intended. Brandmeistertalk 10:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This is part of the broader Category:Parallel universes (fiction) tree but I'm not sure why that or the main article, Parallel universe (fiction), need the parenthetical. (While there is a disambiguation article for Parallel universe, all the scientific theories are actually called something else.) No objection to this nomination, but I would broaden it. RevelationDirect (talk) 18:40, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support A much better solution would be to move the main cat to Category:Parallel universes in fiction, which also defines the article content as covering the idea, but not being instances of parallel universes themselves. SFB 09:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_November_1&oldid=1074797295"