The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename to Category:Palace Entertainment. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose renaming Category:Palace Entertainment parks and chains to Category:Palace Entertainment parks
Nominator's rationale: Simplify the name, since the "chains" are of parks as well. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alternate Rename: Some of these are rather too small to be considered an amusement "park" in my book and are the size of a larger Chucke E Cheese. How about we simplify the category even further to Category:Palace Entertainment? That would also match the lead article name. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No objections here. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Garbage collection (computer science)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename. Some articles in this category are, strictly speaking, not garbage collection algorithms, but forms of automatic memory management. Also avoids the need to disambiguate the category name. —Ruud 17:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:London Skolars rugby league players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Merge. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Merge Obvious duplication of information. Pichpich (talk) 14:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Adult Swim video albums
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Keep. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:33, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Links only one article, not enough articles to populate the category. JJ98 (Talk) 10:23, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There's nothing wrong with a one-article category. Pichpich (talk) 14:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Delete: Upmerge to Category:Adult Swim albums. I don't see anything gained by placing this article by itself; if anything it complicates navigation. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. We separated out the video albums from the main albums some time ago. If we're thinking about making a change, this is not where I'd start.--Mike Selinker (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedia cleanup capitalization
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Merge. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Propose merging Category:Wikipedia cleanup capitalization to Category:Pages with several capitalization mistakes
Nominator's rationale: Pages have same scope; {{capitals}}, which placed articles in Category:Wikipedia cleanup capitalization, has been redirected to {{capitalization}}, which places articles in Category:Pages with several capitalization mistakes. I'm also thinking rename Category:Pages with several capitalization mistakes to Category:Wikipedia pages with several capitalization mistakes to follow common naming conventions? — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 08:40, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:American actors of Slovak descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:American actors of Slovak descent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale:Delete. per the recent consensus per WP:CATGRS to delete ethnicity-occupation intersections which are not notable. It was tagged on February 4 but never formally nominated. See [1] TM 02:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per BHG. Overcategorisation. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.