Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/CloudNineBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Operator: CloudNine

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): Python

Function Summary: Scan through talk pages of articles at Wikipedia:Peer review to update Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Peer review. Other WikiProject reviews can be updated on request.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Once/twice-weekly

Edit rate requested: 1-2 edit per week

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):

Function Details: See User:CloudNineBot.

Discussion

Approved for trial (2 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Should be enough to see the results of the bot. Reedy Boy 19:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] - Updating the peer review page from zero peer reviews. [2] - Updating the peer review when there's been no change. (To fully test things I'll have to wait for another alternative music peer review request to be submitted). CloudNine 20:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That looks fine. Approved for trial (5 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Give you a bit more room to try it out and such. Reedy Boy 12:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is the current inactivity of the bot due to a lack of peer review submissions or a lesser need for this bot? — madman bum and angel 17:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[3] and [4] are more examples. Peer review isn't the most active of arenas, so it would explain the inactivity. CloudNine 20:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. – Make sure to run it regularly. — madman bum and angel 19:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.