Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yūka Kato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 00:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yūka Kato

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG independent of the band, NMB48. A merge could overwhelm that article, particularly as this is an unreferenced BLP I don't think any of it should be copied over, though a redirect is a possible WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Normally an unreferenced BLP (biography of a living person) would be grounds enough for deletion per WP:BLPPROD, but it looks like this article escaped deletion due to the corresponding article on Japanese Wikipedia, which cites many sources. Perhaps a compromise would be to redirect to the band NMB48 if no citations are added. It could always be re-created as an article if/when an editor gets around to adding citations and possibly expanding it with more meaningful biographical information. (Incidentally, there should probably be a hat note distinguishing from other people with similar names such as Yuka Kato.) Cielquiparle (talk) 15:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a flagrant violation of WP:BEFORE and WP:NOENG. The Japanese-version of this article includes 58 citations including from Oricon News, Asahi, Nikkan Sports and more. A quick Google search in Japanese also pulls up plenty of citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DCsansei (talk • contribs) 20:10, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the Japanese article having citations mentioned above.Perfectstrangerz (talk) 01:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Japanese wiki article has lots of RS. Clearly passes WP:GNG per those references. The English wiki article can be improved and expanded based on those sources.4meter4 (talk) 19:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.