Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yōko Honna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yōko Honna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little to no inline citations, lack of major news coverage, and a lack of notable roles to display the subject's notability. Sk8erPrince (talk) 06:45, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I only see one extremely strong notabie role as Nagisa / Cure Black in the Pretty Cure franchise. In the first Pretty Cure! series, there are only two magical girls, Cure White and Cure Black. She's Cure Black. She reprises her role in films and all the All Stars films and specials. She is also the main character Ange in Koi suru Tenshi Angelique but it isn't as notable. In Mobile Suit Gundam 00 she voices Sumeragi Lee Noriega who's a major character. She voices Anri Yoshino in Sakura Wars: New York who looks to be supporting.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to argue that this still isn't enough for Yoko to warrant her own article. If anything, her page should probably be redirected to Cure Black, given that it's her most notable role. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 23:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep These sources [1][2] give information about her life, and talk about her pregnancy. She also appears to have had a presence (I don't know how big) in the magazine Famitsu (February 21, 2013 issue). There is too much to indicate notability here. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't sure of the subject's presence in the Famitsu magazine, you said. So I don't think you could use this as a valid point for this debate. Regardless of how many news articles you could find, the subject is only really notable for Nagisa in the original Precure, so I think her page should either be deleted or redirected to the Precure page. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If multiple independent sources are giving details about her life then she would pass WP:GNG. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 11:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep, more than enough notable roles to warrant inclusion. Redirecting to a single series is a ridiculous suggestion. —Xezbeth (talk) 04:14, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not ridiculous. I still stand by my claim that the subject is only clearly notable as Natalie in the original Precure series. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per above; WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG met. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 07:57, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I have no choice but to withdraw this AFD. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:15, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.