Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XSpot Wealth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

XSpot Wealth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Besides the sources already cited in the article, e.g. emea and newmoney, there are a few more news organisations that mention the company (euro2day, Insider.gr 1 2, asfalisinet.gr, reporter.gr). However, the coverage all clearly falls into categories that are not suitable for use in establishing notability, the announcements of personnel changes and new offices, interviews, "they wrote an article for us", etc. I've not been able to find anything useful through TWL or Gale either. Unfortunately, it seems unlikely there will be sufficient coverage to meet WP:ORGCRIT unless something substantially changes with the company. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Greece. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:18, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Coverge is not in-depht and by secondary reliable sources. ǁǁǁ ǁ Chalk19 (talk) 10:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.