Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wykked Wytch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:01, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wykked Wytch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to this article's talk page, Wykked Wytch was previously deleted after a proposed deletion but then recreated because the deletion was contested. If this is the case, the band's notability has not been demonstrated since recreation. Unaware of a previous proposed deletion, I proposed the deletion of this article earlier this month. The deletion was contested by User:Fences and windows who stated that references would follow. After five days, he had not done so, therefore I contacted him on his talk page. He affirmed that he would add references soon, however it has been another five days and no references have been produced. Wykked Wytch has produced no notable albums; all four albums have had articles in the past which have subsequently been deleted. This band fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musical ensembles and should therefore be deleted. Neelix (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep referenced now, although band's notability is debatable.--Jimbo W junior (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator - The references do not demonstrate that the band is notable, therefore they do not justify keeping the article. My search for adequate references apart from those provided on the article has not suggested that the band is notable either. Jimbo W junior acknowledges that the band's notability has not been demonstrated; the article should therefore be deleted. Neelix (talk) 18:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 22:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 02:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.