Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Vaisnava Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World Vaisnava Association

Non notable non-registered indian company? Wikidās ॐ 23:34, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL a different organization to Visva Vaishnava Raja Sabha (that is possibly notable or historic). Wikidās ॐ 23:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 00:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- Abecedare (talk) 00:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per A7 non notability §hawnpoo 04:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I started this article since there were several red links to it at the home. However, it does seem that the "World Vaisnava Association" isn't really notable. I would not object to it being deleted. --Ixfd64 (talk) 04:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Lots more results turn up if you search under an alternative spelling: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:20, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per A7 non notability. Organization does exist, but it is not notable. Article can be recreated in the future if this organization becomes notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.